IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Next Steps on DAD Improvements

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Thu, 17 December 2015 10:34 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 932541A8A8F for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 02:34:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FM4mNsaYC0G0 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 02:34:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x235.google.com (mail-io0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E4AD1A8A7B for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 02:34:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x235.google.com with SMTP id q126so50367292iof.2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 02:34:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=6sX0JygkxrMiGwdhu/3Qi3otex0cAkN9JdS+Dn/mO4w=; b=lGfqUeRc3dbUOP66N0mEF6C3W9nMTPS+uXYZYsPMw3EtiimCpq/3i+neFSnDZ29qaX meQXcy7s06eoHO/igVCqX35tPTnghJ9jEdpaAmU0bw+B44gPyGnxB5/AbxsftQiPMdMh qqZbN6tsUnFO/amsKCX+hFu+n6zTtPa6sDk+/P7K0c2jwmQ/1Lli0YIQ+MZ63CSCM1xw ugCeUnZQzVS6ehvj2prQf0pXJIKwI5vcYmnST6YZxbQ2576nPziYbzSa8TVxvhwaMiHS 5fgnZVOmfTBz1cP7UjnADNanpsyBO2gpqd1VqsSjQ/Mlyfthm51qdGtJUhLY3Ox0W7AH ptrA==
X-Received: by 10.107.36.208 with SMTP id k199mr55113004iok.147.1450348473832; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 02:34:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.24.251.152] ([194.29.32.131]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s13sm4377043ioi.29.2015.12.17.02.34.31 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 17 Dec 2015 02:34:32 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Next Steps on DAD Improvements
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DADB1037-BD00-405D-BAE5-B6C0E2B32A2B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8CD12D24-FFB3-4F92-9E13-B4D9A40F3B3A@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 12:34:21 +0200
Message-Id: <59ABE8C1-BAC1-44B4-85BD-6050F6B2E0D9@gmail.com>
References: <8CD12D24-FFB3-4F92-9E13-B4D9A40F3B3A@gmail.com>
To: IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/V8RyEXCZQjU4eU-kZSxl2r68nMI>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 10:34:36 -0000

Hi,

The chairs have reviewed the responses to our question to the working group.  Our conclusion is that there is adequate interest in the w.g. for work to continue on DAD improvements.

Bob & Ole

> On Jun 8, 2015, at 11:02 PM, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> At the 6man WG meeting in Dallas there was discussion on what to do (if anything) about duplicate address detection.  The background on this is documented in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yourtchenko-6man-dad-issues/
> 
> Should we work on the robustness and efficiency issues of DAD?  For example, improving DAD in environments where nodes sleep and on links with high packet loss.  We think that DAD robustness and efficiency are intertwined and we need solutions that take both into account.
> 
> In case the WG wants to address these issues, there is an outline of how they can be addressed in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nordmark-6man-dad-approaches/.  This is probably not the only way they can be addressed, but the draft indicates that the issues are solvable.
> 
> The chair would like your feedback on this issue and if there is interest we will schedule an agenda slot in Prague.
> 
> Bob and Ole
> 6MAN Chairs
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email