Re: To DAD or not to DAD?

[Fernando Gont <[e-mail]>]

Hi, Erik,

On 02/18/2015 04:46 PM, Erik Nordmark wrote:
> 
> The key questions in the design team report was what to do about DAD.
> But we haven't had any discussion on this on the list and I'd like to
> get some feedback from the WG to we can move forward.
> 
> The slides offered these options:
> 1. Deprecate DAD - it is expensive and duplicates are not common
> 2. Only send and receive DAD for manually configured addresses
> 3. Improve DAD
>  3a. Better at detecting duplicates (partition-join, etc)
>  3b. Less network and host impact (allow sleep schedule)
> 4. Do nothing a. aka go to the beach ;-)

I'm all for option 3.


> Given that the beach is kind of cold this time of year, we can remove
> the 4th choice from the list.
> More seriously, the WG needs to decide how to move forward with DAD.
> 
> Would it be helpful to present draft-yourtchenko-6man-dad-issues in
> Dallas? Or can we have an email discussion without/prior to such a
> presentation?

I'd suggest to start email discussion prior to the f2f meeting such that
we can probably frame the discussion and then mke more progress during
the f2f meeting.

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: [e-mail] || [e-mail]
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1