Re: [v6ops] Combining IPv6 ND and DHCPv6 into a single, unified function

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 23 November 2017 00:19 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A44531293E4; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:19:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i-VebzRhkgg7; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:18:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot0-x230.google.com (mail-ot0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0620A126C22; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:18:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot0-x230.google.com with SMTP id u10so15015084otc.12; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:18:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=mkVHLGosuK6D4fvH5NX735h1EAbKVAXRkwin/j2h4iU=; b=extC4uDo9MJNqdc/fKhxmqTVEUwIxxOVlZqaLtDcms5XRcH6rYr1NuDYjUiCs4jqOO cmmprSlrbt0Oss+kUa1JQH0GRHerwb1KL5JmgJspuF2kytEXdhOnWWqen+un2TU8tZBG DEUdyQCrpzb9XfzCqOod6HGtjQTA9accgSXy4/HOH2D9dMhu84ECdIwKDfRmefLco7IL CUzcHJGmif9ogYdk3XOpxDgd3o62Guh+fcyX9+RbCRJR24yYJYHIXPPCj66/GVpu3J5v FWAXkdBA6ju+U6cOxT1Uc35zEBSWwQky3E128onE3/aOReQTfwPIMh+5qucNCP2iYwi8 EKAg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=mkVHLGosuK6D4fvH5NX735h1EAbKVAXRkwin/j2h4iU=; b=UkU0uq4QA+8qQSYYew9URp+HTza+rqelJ3oeWDan2e9+O3QSprY5Gt4HsYOXxH6ppA Qo1D2xmTivUDdX01+hzjuSSoZGBOsIVfI/Yk79WxvmJ3SrO8TSWdCO4flknVEtwLBsLC b33txHgZMLR5xMRJ7Az88jMssnIKdiQOomeMr6iUbjKXvHOzTlTDcZD43om4/Z4pZ9aU mlmilZn6jwCKPF/9f/SwRAhzoEKX9X7PyeF2nkz20XKWDto6CGGcTG2lEMR73ucI4Bxb nipwEWOHaA6tgiqteR57iHKmjCJ16PpCQoO0oAjsaIdJ7JS6tHK3W37iIlF7WpURGgPU PDzw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX7QDbhFx/2F2g9qcVkAL5xxh0mT/WHl3Wk061BeJl6qEugWEGB4 cJt8puFT/Y20+Sf7nrDsmOMu7zPd
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZuSsk6cEn3qwf5uaLvzSgMtZVNeDhlZ6LWVUND7eQjLNkJjJ/X4Kxm8cZhyPTzmMtjmNT0RA==
X-Received: by 10.157.8.163 with SMTP id 32mr14250859otf.114.1511396338391; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:18:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:8802:5600:f7a::1005? ([2600:8802:5600:f7a::1005]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r184sm6900080oia.40.2017.11.22.16.18.56 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:18:57 -0800 (PST)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <E49D982F-9A83-4B7E-B65F-2CB07AB56ADD@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7ADA12C3-756D-4F37-B43D-1A8598748450"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Combining IPv6 ND and DHCPv6 into a single, unified function
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:18:54 -0800
In-Reply-To: <27327.1511369630@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
References: <9debb1672e3d4f0d89d672d64e0fe579@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CAKD1Yr1+a+Bg3N=pX5_X2vhvkf50hY7N_Ay=aQQyq5ogsEWWMw@mail.gmail.com> <4e01cd6cc5234daca2f7be55b8cc28b0@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <27327.1511369630@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/J1zNHzL-yEwd2bDZ5-csEmYqt00>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 00:19:00 -0000


> On Nov 22, 2017, at 8:53 AM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>; wrote:
> 
> My understanding is that Fred Templin essentially wants to carry DHCP
> (configuration) options in ND/RA.

On thing that I have never understood is the lack of an RA option that carries any DHCPv6 option. This entire silly debate would end if RAs encompassed DHCP options.