IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: DHCPv6-PD is fine

"Templin (US), Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> Mon, 09 November 2020 16:46 UTC

Return-Path: <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59BDF3A11E0 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 08:46:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=boeing.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8LaNV1nm2CQH for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 08:46:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ewa-mbsout-01.mbs.boeing.net (ewa-mbsout-01.mbs.boeing.net [130.76.20.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 850B03A11DA for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 08:46:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ewa-mbsout-01.mbs.boeing.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/DOWNSTREAM_MBSOUT) with SMTP id 0A9Gjw8D037912; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 08:46:06 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=boeing.com; s=boeing-s1912; t=1604940366; bh=5Uf8jJ5fFUnFO3EjXJHAzob60fBZXxp7QZt7uwVbDmU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=bRj+jRJ3Jx38BUydSulvPkQNbn2sgEXpYJbnBv6GujZQUS2zt13/7qdGCRwGYeSKh D/aRS5heKrG6kRDPJ5ohzW1wvG0nL3/9iz10yi24OvwsISDg/WCdlLaedLptxTg9IQ xbWaUdi1lkLrH4dYMb+z750bZe5d7sjYLrKlXkkEJQ3FcXehqnfibyHPF7ZkwFqwKS ViNofO8dz1b3vSMX8Cb3cCGlkwWwIpLy0KmrRqyBzig66+115XggKY53vi6x2NV+rA CChqwVNMs3PUwhrSfXAMBAH3VFB76n8hkV/2BwagpY/je66HodEzb0tAcJdChUyX2k J5oMJkLaIf1+w==
Received: from XCH16-07-12.nos.boeing.com (xch16-07-12.nos.boeing.com [144.115.66.114]) by ewa-mbsout-01.mbs.boeing.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/8.15.2/UPSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTPS id 0A9GjtCH037778 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 9 Nov 2020 08:45:55 -0800
Received: from XCH16-07-10.nos.boeing.com (144.115.66.112) by XCH16-07-12.nos.boeing.com (144.115.66.114) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.1.2044.4; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 08:45:53 -0800
Received: from XCH16-07-10.nos.boeing.com ([fe80::1522:f068:5766:53b5]) by XCH16-07-10.nos.boeing.com ([fe80::1522:f068:5766:53b5%2]) with mapi id 15.01.2044.004; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 08:45:53 -0800
From: "Templin (US), Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: DHCPv6-PD is fine
Thread-Topic: DHCPv6-PD is fine
Thread-Index: Ada2t8jmlCA25DTCRH2QjN3TcGyuSw==
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2020 16:45:53 +0000
Message-ID: <eb3d7888042d4048abb0b6f68793a6d8@boeing.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [137.137.12.6]
x-tm-snts-smtp: A7B9BD35A4B8DE986B31FE8D6C584095C97D454B4DE1BF24654DE823BB4B0DD62000:8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/M3WtjhblCGZwcyK--QrxvgNUxIU>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2020 16:46:10 -0000

Hi Alex,

> Fred, maybe people in the aviation can deploy their own ground networks
> to accomodate planes with OMNI interfaces.  At that point it is easy to
> say DHCPv6-PD is fine.
> 
> But in other places, automobiles for example, one must use the existing
> cellular networks.  DHCPv6-PD is not fine there.  It's not FUD.

No, we made a good case for considering OMNI for worldwide ground and air
mobility in urban environments in the ipwave problem statement. DHCPv6-PD
is included in that by inheritance.

Thanks - Fred

> This discussion has become so complicated that it seems to me impossibly
> complex to come up with something that satisfies even a minority.
> 
> OMNI and DHCPv6-PD, Ethernet P2P, Variable SLAAC, 464XLAT, Mobile IPv6
> with NEMO extensions, and others - are each a potential solution to some
> environment.
> 
> Alex
> 
> >
> > Fred
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> > ipv6@ietf.org
> > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email