IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [internet-drafts@ietf.org: New Version Notification for draft-jones-6man-historic-rfc2675-00.txt]

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Wed, 08 May 2019 13:12 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 663451200F6 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 May 2019 06:12:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swm.pp.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oXy1RbIoL1si for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 May 2019 06:12:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13A411200DF for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 May 2019 06:12:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id C7AFDB5; Wed, 8 May 2019 15:12:50 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1557321170; bh=RhBlLrMYG4EpN09IOYXqFwvMtZe74vlCYtoVrVnOifM=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=oZmubEzuC2dyO7IRj3pjrm93ikzUBlB7czez7UHAoEhasYHCtJGPcAXkMxYua2brI NG3GYduTtOvSgMrzzUo2P+yIRe0mWbx5YDqeTu+9q0HZeSYOkMluuQShZ+aSixjm5x QUw93/D+HxiYZEHgjX8thD54HlduqoAk9IEEbBrw=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4A13B0; Wed, 8 May 2019 15:12:50 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 08 May 2019 15:12:50 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Tom Jones <tom@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [internet-drafts@ietf.org: New Version Notification for draft-jones-6man-historic-rfc2675-00.txt]
In-Reply-To: <20190508125743.GA19360@tom-desk.erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1905081505400.1824@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <20190508125743.GA19360@tom-desk.erg.abdn.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/Nv7rqmx7Ts6dO9BfpayAdfGLjD8>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 May 2019 13:12:56 -0000

On Wed, 8 May 2019, Tom Jones wrote:

> Hello 6man,
>
> We have put this together to change the status of RFC2675 to Historic 
> and would like to request discussion in the working group.

I'd like to see the abstract to include the difference between jumbograms 
and jumboframes. This is explained later in the introduction but I think 
it's important to mention this in the abstract to avoid confusion.

Apart from that, looks good to me.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email