Re: RFC 4861 missing updated-by

Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> Tue, 15 August 2017 09:11 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 649A913203D for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 02:11:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xsals6fY5Qlg for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 02:11:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from accordion.employees.org (accordion.employees.org [198.137.202.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A91BD1204DA for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 02:11:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from h.hanazo.no (219.103.92.62.static.cust.telenor.com [62.92.103.219]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by accordion.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A80CC2D4FD1; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 09:11:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by h.hanazo.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC532F7137B9; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 11:11:03 +0200 (CEST)
From: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
Message-Id: <8318F69E-BD7C-404F-9420-0FEA1340936E@employees.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_988F99BA-D729-49CE-8890-5D14BFE6C219"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Re: RFC 4861 missing updated-by
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 11:11:02 +0200
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1708130754510.3655@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1708100947130.2261@uplift.swm.pp.se> <8447.1502388439@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <a3ed97e2-e907-6a20-0d00-6de532784f0c@nostrum.com> <826ee900-0edf-2bb4-ed35-3824b6ad8bba@gmail.com> <2664CA78-2291-46C7-ACF9-460AA3A51706@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1708110743410.2261@uplift.swm.pp.se> <52cae497-9539-3ba3-70b7-0bb55317f986@gmail.com> <12017.1502561028@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1708130754510.3655@uplift.swm.pp.se>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/QwbWUrdb8Xx4RlsCMAgnmen0g5I>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 09:11:13 -0000

I don't think adding a new flag in a "Reserved" field qualifies as updating an RFC.
That's what we have IANA registries for.

/ot

> On 13 Aug 2017, at 07:55, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 12 Aug 2017, Michael Richardson wrote:
> 
>> I think that the IESG should be able to create new forward references without publishing new documents.  It should be a relatively cheap operation.
> 
> Agreed. Potentially it could be done with a 2 week last call announcement so that if anyone disagrees, their voice can be heard.
> 
> --
> Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------