IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: RFC 4861 missing updated-by

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 10 August 2017 20:06 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E290413243E for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 13:06:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mMOKOq9-8LwZ for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 13:06:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x230.google.com (mail-pf0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0527D13243C for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 13:06:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x230.google.com with SMTP id t86so7184334pfe.2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 13:06:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VREML65EpvZGR6ssbazULhrUFOTAeVIWHmYJVTrBW/o=; b=jMDj5XOYsx5K+1BoU5jCti8umBJpfCA9HNJlKvK6o0U5LJWRB4VaJSHlpqzHYXgZ6x uxkcBZQq0P+TBJBoKObFz/aucWLCa+rLAvMhn69sBmJuvZ3CBP9j6nKQ0qNGqKfwlX/0 hUeetY7adrrRY65QOw4Klu6XWPASyPeXy22NDZOJm8PaWa+SZb2BmFp2D9bxMeQWwQVE /1F8g15/BeS1exApG3en0/Ijl4A0t6wDrBdhx8XhC45BFKOZnodE4CXC610PcUm5wMTp mmxueD0Y+j7oC929ZERvkcEcPY1KQRC0vA0djWvkM4UoVmWkkc41ja+gLSpFW8H+UXcy WdMA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VREML65EpvZGR6ssbazULhrUFOTAeVIWHmYJVTrBW/o=; b=sKOUqe259d/+Qd477c2CyiI5jw3vdm9U4nngcbmpjZAeFd2XcXxG3lEQzboe2iyNDD A/HDwlTysCL9RqcsF47gL428jMsAEkYIQvhg37oYhaEqhkgYay0D1P5wtdSl1bsM2Six U60aryZRZyrxzMvhJkd3FLwFyfX6NDUq2zcipI59ewUrFw8Qd8pxBhrpgatC8V1rO0Md jxCfs0I4vPCdz0BYkbKlelWSuQvN4fpo7x5WVji3755pYWrHJvLALBMpoh/jkG8lZz5m VhsQ199BMeJTnkXtYH/27YPka1SSNo5Bp8QJgpWYP195nQXKV1ngv1C30Y74gpNLV4fN rs7g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5iQWtPvq/d7ByVkHdRpijVlpSBuX6bQspDF/zeXNjXBmqkJIe1/ 5uo2D6+UQbXOlu1v
X-Received: by 10.98.86.70 with SMTP id k67mr13755996pfb.91.1502395564302; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 13:06:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:521f:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:521f:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t64sm11650559pgd.80.2017.08.10.13.06.02 for <ipv6@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Aug 2017 13:06:03 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: RFC 4861 missing updated-by
To: ipv6@ietf.org
References: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1708100947130.2261@uplift.swm.pp.se> <8447.1502388439@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <a3ed97e2-e907-6a20-0d00-6de532784f0c@nostrum.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <826ee900-0edf-2bb4-ed35-3824b6ad8bba@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 08:06:08 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a3ed97e2-e907-6a20-0d00-6de532784f0c@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/gGUvvTiGKGcrYqIVGzFtrkLNjZk>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 20:06:07 -0000

On 11/08/2017 06:38, Robert Sparks wrote:
> This is a question for the IESG (it's more a question of policy than it 
> is tool capability).

I would say it's a question for the RFC Editor, who would ask for advice
from the IESG since these are IETF stream documents. (It's the RFC Editor
who maintains the metatdata for RFCs.)

    Brian

> 
> I'm pretty sure the question's been asked before (and the discussion led 
> to a "no, if you want to fix this, do it with an RFC").
> 
> RjS
> 
> 
> On 8/10/17 1:07 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
>> Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:
>>      > FYI. I decided to raise an errata against RFC6275 that seems to update
>>      > RFC4861 without this being noted anywhere in either document.
>>
>> Are we able to update the metadata on RFC4861 in response to this errata?
>> I realize we can't re-issue 6275.
>>
>> Since the Updates is to make sure that readers of 4861 know about new things,
>> the metadata 4861->6275 (which shows up in the tools page and datatracker for
>> the old documents) is really the important direction.
>>
>> --
>> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
>>   -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
>>
>>
>>
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> .
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email