Re: I-D Action: draft-smith-6man-in-flight-eh-insertion-harmful-00.txt

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Sun, 13 October 2019 00:53 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AFF01200EF for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 17:53:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.68
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.68 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y0zAeWjgsY3e for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 17:53:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from maila2.tigertech.net (maila2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D63791200DF for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 17:53:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46rNVH5KjTz1W4hd for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 17:53:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=2.tigertech; t=1570928023; bh=C6zhMxAzs0WMJeyIzpyr7awvGbnq5dXA6PRePAYYhXs=; h=Subject:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=XwM7bnL5WwLwKrQ3vjuj4HF3iX+WOZlOIjaod5UfnABD96MfdXSSU/5ujBa+W8pm0 xp6K6s+XC2As932S/dxa0/TQA0k7FBoG6h3Z+zTo4duyDtTAhsudE4gqFNTSf64HX6 C/72RK1Qa1/DmKK/VPh0utrLCj+L8NpANmHdhFt4=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at maila2.tigertech.net
Received: from [172.20.7.244] (209-255-163-147.ip.mcleodusa.net [209.255.163.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 46rNVH2GSgz1W4hS for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 17:53:43 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-smith-6man-in-flight-eh-insertion-harmful-00.txt
Cc: 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>
References: <157059901123.30422.11220423219059958820@ietfa.amsl.com> <362b80f7-fedc-7227-2931-0006e6b81812@gmail.com> <f2548b48-2d8d-01f0-f05c-0027a5cdeb91@foobar.org>
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Message-ID: <65398432-ff12-4c30-cceb-917edfd67fe9@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 20:53:42 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f2548b48-2d8d-01f0-f05c-0027a5cdeb91@foobar.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/_dhP59or3M0usORBbhLnmDZJ044>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 00:53:46 -0000

It seems to me, given the problems with the open internet that
Because I want to
and I think I have made everything safe for it

does not constitute a good reason for violating an RFC.  particularly 
one that was extensively discussed.
If the draft actually provided a significant reason for wanting the 
exception, we could debate the risks versus benefits.  But it does not 
do so.

Hence, Brian, I think you are cutting them more slack than they have earned.

Yours,
Joel

On 10/12/2019 8:08 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Brian E Carpenter wrote on 12/10/2019 23:15:
>> EH insertion for packets that traverse the open Internet is certainly 
>> harmful and violates RFC 8200
> 
> How does the packet know whether it's the open internet or a controlled 
> domain?
> 
> Nick
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>