IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Scripting attacks [was Next step for draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis]

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Thu, 30 June 2022 20:40 UTC

Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A937C15A729 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 13:40:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.182
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.182 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=1.592, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.876, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VXIFJMAmBpAE for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 13:40:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [91.239.96.14]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D251C14CF02 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 13:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPV6:2001:67c:27e4:c::1000] (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:27e4:c::1000]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8FE3B280501; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 20:39:59 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <912de2c5-d614-f931-a607-a3669b238a1a@si6networks.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 14:35:51 -0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1
Subject: Re: Scripting attacks [was Next step for draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis]
Content-Language: en-US
To: Kerry Lynn <kerlyn=40ieee.org@dmarc.ietf.org>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>, 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
References: <164938402532.17740.11717866110301931501@ietfa.amsl.com> <b1780128-2069-b32e-7ca5-86977c119f0c@gmail.com> <11d4e419-11a9-8768-abf2-1335e5f1c3d8@gmail.com> <149924f9-da30-fa79-0509-c01c439d1796@gmail.com> <5BEFA97B-CF09-44D7-8C10-017FEAE4C3A8@tiesel.net> <e6ff75e7-b6c6-ea03-2e10-b1ad95d650f0@gmail.com> <98D15BD9-A631-4D09-AE9E-9D4C750714C9@tiesel.net> <95c82ad3-2138-ab2a-7ba5-57ad80472964@gmail.com> <E5C368C5-9DAE-4C61-ADDE-B881EA11EDA0@tiesel.net> <6968ca7b-dac3-b192-41ed-a193adab7eb4@gmail.com> <529B863C-BCC9-40C1-A5B8-B0598E7DF17C@tzi.org> <bf8c5c54-d548-a40a-0381-0583ef946f26@gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=4wbqrrzvwdr4FD7awa6pkyffhwRZC3zAWLs7uzY3BJQ@mail.gmail.com> <86509E47-77CE-4210-A1B7-C1E9955D9672@tzi.org> <CAPt1N1kYBMSA5Y7BZLMd9o96tBxFY7SrRUxb9jxfBNvBiA_OJQ@mail.gmail.com> <d3d9d68a-adff-b29b-4d1b-78f82e6bf282@gmail.com> <A2DD6902-EF02-4EA4-80D3-18820B912DF1@tzi.org> <CABOxzu1VvoGY+Lc5iw81vV+-k98YvDzSYgfzJOxt6Sc04+0+WQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABOxzu1VvoGY+Lc5iw81vV+-k98YvDzSYgfzJOxt6Sc04+0+WQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/bF2nz9fS7dHazkP3qL1o0DtqIfg>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 20:40:09 -0000

Hi, Kerry,

On 30/6/22 11:19, Kerry Lynn wrote:
[....]
> 
> Is it sufficient to say there are easier ways to gather LL host addresses?
> 
> Maybe I'm missing something, but for LL address scanning mustn't the 
> attacker
> already be on the link? 

Well, if you have a JS page and you can trick the victim to visit such 
page, then the victim inadvertently becomes the attacker's on-link 
presence ;-)

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email