IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Giving up security & privacy when manually configuring addresses - rfc4291bis text (Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00)

Job Snijders <job@instituut.net> Wed, 07 June 2017 03:40 UTC

Return-Path: <job@instituut.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA60D127869 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 20:40:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=instituut-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p9d3SuRrQBWK for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 20:40:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x22a.google.com (mail-wr0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CC5F129B7A for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 20:40:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id g76so464259wrd.1 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 06 Jun 2017 20:40:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=instituut-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5qk4/j1t2LA4tdYm7NXFO57wZVtsZ3NogAnF2YCz3p8=; b=Ck6Dv0vH2hjYM0wmsFw3eH+aIH8F8Q3GugmU5/3cMyUgvtAVWaUpZqbhowAZwkU72/ MzmZe86PhlghIYnhNcx1C/Lfypvj7f9NMVkmzYkv/3NTNXeEvXhTzRSGfkgvp4HbTEuo M0OgMswOYY9kXyB7lNKX1eUUjk1h9ObiXg163bdutYtTUvver7yx8HHod8Jx4c5nFWBi /KWmpK97wBz3mhO+vXPvr77r8qQyFgcoGK+EXpaZNlSvMC9aRExsrd8ohmuRiX4zcZj9 zwBqYpElF7JhuEQGMNjzqV1gWupTfMDvx+rx57k4m10cOwVjFWaaovaIyJjDuvPZ+xW2 5l9Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5qk4/j1t2LA4tdYm7NXFO57wZVtsZ3NogAnF2YCz3p8=; b=A9itdldi1vjanEm8qEoZ8nDRMpdpbgWXct2UA4t7M4Pm1HiIwVbAvCIZnudXJVXPi8 y50Vuw/4w3DDivAn9W6J4pQYuRK62co/oCJBgM2b4UMiKDqqkb7+oLDM4i5P8KToSfXB bBiSLJuepl2SNL44hrjxVQw/RMzgnh5FfP4vo6Y1p3+dkSG7iQ2Bqd93Qb8B5g3HVyfb hNJ7pS5bNi+yGAQOAB3Hpl3A7mFUUON3evu2y52Q0HUQdsu3w7FSJ/wyf6TP9QGAM2oK Jy/HbsW3eOFHNqoE3rfZ+XdbSdpvt3Ju9+24y4OTdefHh4l7iX/xY+5V5x51gYRZNECG H7ag==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDiK4gnOhufzQpGJ7gTo/ejjImcs0UVE5rIVa6BFzC/IfKDc6Td VBzm1HRUUnU1CRN/Ey85G+ane/6ckzXB
X-Received: by 10.223.177.158 with SMTP id q30mr10896302wra.82.1496806852944; Tue, 06 Jun 2017 20:40:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAO42Z2ziUZnK+n2f9N_Xvb5TZBppApXgNSmDsRLxaT1_taLvFw@mail.gmail.com> <EB4E2A17-B77F-40B8-B565-B3BBC1E378B3@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <EB4E2A17-B77F-40B8-B565-B3BBC1E378B3@gmail.com>
From: Job Snijders <job@instituut.net>
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2017 03:40:41 +0000
Message-ID: <CACWOCC_7QpGexm8HBiEjjYdPjgkNwVCGiLg_yDNgK71BndA=Ew@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Giving up security & privacy when manually configuring addresses - rfc4291bis text (Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00)
To: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>, Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, Erik Kline <ek@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045ec41ec479460551568015"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/bbHJgBck-bvLy80VZ4oR47WISGU>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2017 03:40:58 -0000

I don't think so.

On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 at 20:37, Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Jun 6, 2017, at 6:23 PM, Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > That doesn't mention that security and privacy properties of addresses
> > will be compromised if the manually configured addresses are from a
> > small prefix.
>
> Or advertised in DNS?
>
> I would expect that any address configured manually would also be
> advertised in DNS, the latter being the reason for the former. If the
> address is publicly announced, does one have a reasonable expectation of
> privacy?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email