Re: Giving up security & privacy when manually configuring addresses - rfc4291bis text (Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00)

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 07 June 2017 03:37 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52C3D129B71 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 20:37:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4slyVxZu87iv for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 20:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x236.google.com (mail-wm0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF444129B51 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 20:37:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x236.google.com with SMTP id d73so2249805wma.0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 06 Jun 2017 20:37:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=volr/qs2En14WwSuIlZ4hsSeXI1v0Al9/QqVIN6jofI=; b=Hs3RKfdY8q/eLHaJ80MDTiZTjp5lBAutjSeWsiAO8/Fo2hF9HtNs7vHz/GRUEZWFHU tPTlivZOcarLnukYNlaRZtpnjsQgCW7x31/vb1ZvpmrYnqP1LQNnoe7/fBmIW39GoDMg 1+iI+bTMTQCKfeKUuXRoTTZXbDu9prv6tPHGaL9gsoxY0fZ2P9Svia9TFehGFluukREW BVmi6kVq3mtb0A36UfMviaKoNjlzMgtGVwSeBwaHjuyz26myVE0q+JdVEkD2gs4IiS4A N6qShUUhK6IFCey2woZLYA71mdU2Eyxdso8SuBvcj+oILirZVGItl1P9+gbX0H+mfGDL /4zA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=volr/qs2En14WwSuIlZ4hsSeXI1v0Al9/QqVIN6jofI=; b=ml/NbY7M45zXwr2hya+5BBRlNWyRJ9EZlvYuwl7WhXCXnAffbkJ6S26tJBCX7oOQs8 38RJyt7FnI3nvZK6N+m4FKbU2hIBgHqbeVSZ/q9+ksNy4Mfk9TO7JscOfIlOCFDktyNI la//JZU1XvKVSfBrD0e92vLEMkgNynUyuBtqs2wnlBl/BAz2S08MlXhxrdjJekoXE/hE 0gfG2l0mjLnltiIDxN/nMWz3Vc986CLaeZvAX6VTBCfaWnArHXy+DtI3sATYWbp79Bpl G1kaZwYUjqUluNyF0voJ62Ga8AZ1yuwmnKOweAPwJMaWtykFVZ4lfVsNtJ7/grzN/Azo 2M6A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcAxQdKnJv/fyhquIHWweQNRbbHAITZXumyIEbTVvIzKeiF2wbQt y7nJ6k0QQdxrMA==
X-Received: by 10.28.28.134 with SMTP id c128mr469970wmc.112.1496806645388; Tue, 06 Jun 2017 20:37:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:8802:5600:1da::1014? ([2600:8802:5600:1da::1014]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 49sm537483wrz.8.2017.06.06.20.37.23 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 06 Jun 2017 20:37:24 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Re: Giving up security & privacy when manually configuring addresses - rfc4291bis text (Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAO42Z2ziUZnK+n2f9N_Xvb5TZBppApXgNSmDsRLxaT1_taLvFw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 20:37:23 -0700
Cc: Job Snijders <job@instituut.net>, Erik Kline <ek@google.com>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EB4E2A17-B77F-40B8-B565-B3BBC1E378B3@gmail.com>
References: <CAO42Z2ziUZnK+n2f9N_Xvb5TZBppApXgNSmDsRLxaT1_taLvFw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/vxB4o1nfquDJjLPJ3ZErLJBSgzE>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2017 03:37:28 -0000

On Jun 6, 2017, at 6:23 PM, Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> That doesn't mention that security and privacy properties of addresses
> will be compromised if the manually configured addresses are from a
> small prefix.

Or advertised in DNS?

I would expect that any address configured manually would also be advertised in DNS, the latter being the reason for the former. If the address is publicly announced, does one have a reasonable expectation of privacy?