IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: 6MAN WG Adoption Call: draft-nordmark-6man-rs-refresh-01

神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> Thu, 23 April 2015 18:33 UTC

Return-Path: <jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A364E1B3179 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 11:33:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bcp6q0MnitY3 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 11:33:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x235.google.com (mail-ie0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C18A1B3183 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 11:32:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iebrs15 with SMTP id rs15so67481720ieb.3 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 11:32:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=gIxYp8s9J88GTt7kerLrE5DVxxDneCr8t1sKRptzRnI=; b=oq/xxZ6Gs/ESf2NjxTotSlwOw07OboqvkwlVbi/SJSbf5vunrqzFfH1TJip+CRcblw 1Al38ZGGqzN/LKb6TDKJ64i62Zft96GTzBRSnkREZr3056t5EklIMLE/rVcI8sSnVrT8 HbXq78XyYH0KSwgezqWNRAze2T48jElWiRi0jImGkzlO/e5RPPpESljdtiZerypvTCWw PSfArpn12vwyOiNHaJkzMIjVjGXi2wRr1d77J+fnABhlcmOURedZcKkmDL/hGjlqJl/j rPt13I2ZZW+msf8C8fMcv7L5+Au3x0+ozmvNksFdg2sr2R4OcDpH0nS1U14X9DiwKY0M 5uBQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.43.163.71 with SMTP id mn7mr5232216icc.72.1429813973143; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 11:32:53 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com
Received: by 10.107.50.80 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 11:32:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <55368786.5000507@acm.org>
References: <16407124-2B19-4B8F-AEAC-F04D3C7E5C3A@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1c80-04CgQKCdGCZPeRgT_M_oeRzzZUnSCVKsaS9kqug@mail.gmail.com> <CAJE_bqfdw_wQRNYept1h8s8a_gj2NOYcqWsGpsFztZbr-B_UEg@mail.gmail.com> <55368786.5000507@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 11:32:53 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Vuv2Bkapn4qdKpHLtHDODYeU76E
Message-ID: <CAJE_bqciFNkukedq6pFYUHVvdh02GEYWEA0Wdb3dFcySz_K4NQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 6MAN WG Adoption Call: draft-nordmark-6man-rs-refresh-01
From: 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
To: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/e9J--fR1KNZ6RWxpUHEo58V5DSU>
Cc: IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 18:33:10 -0000

At Tue, 21 Apr 2015 10:23:18 -0700,
Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org> wrote:

> > I was not sure if we had agreed on sufficient need for making
> > non-trivial (if not substantial) changes to a core part of the
> > protocol.  If what Lorenzo was trying to say is a different form of
> > what I tried to ask, I tend to agree with part of his argument.
> > Although I'm not necessarily opposed to adopting the document just
> > because of that, I think it's reasonable to request clarifying the
> > problem statement and expected goal.
>
> Please send text on what you would want to see as (part of) PS and goals.

It was very vague and abstract level of thought when I wrote this, so
I wouldn't have been able to propose any specific text.  But I guess
Lorenzo seemed to answer the request pretty well in his later message:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg22477.html

--
JINMEI, Tatuya

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email