IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPv6] Request for WG adoption call for draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 18 April 2024 23:44 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9D18C14F6A4 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 16:44:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.397
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.397 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V05wjV8FIAi9 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 16:44:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36F94C14F6A3 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 16:44:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8FA638991 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 19:43:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 5hgoSXVFHWUm for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 19:43:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0DB838990 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 19:43:56 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1713483836; bh=PZYRdOQsNfxbTVtdOkSgge+JH2jAFvNtk+0VU/BRREA=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=fege6Pbp3xgyB9tD806GI3X0C/uz0+MCsx98K5SMvyp441366X9slKkNk24Zcm2Yz 9vAtvtU+DQ2JS7hZpmC/pVssCagPaN1QXt95ntkmMe27qdaOqRL40QYk6MtZufxF6F 8NvWUzDLi3U1P7cHpQV6mo//nJBRzRcZkKwqpG4oD6MuU7Sl/6Tt8CHgxjUb7f06dR V/G6XUosezkZjzSbrcThaLmPqaDbqv4PmBsoBqgGtQjiB3tL/0huzloOfK4osM13q+ TtqbM4dI+1eo200zV9nhqy8EzePb2l5PAzapnT+GOkFlGoNbrWHNVvT9SojZcFV42a +CJipT59HY2vA==
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F0C40 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 19:43:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <58fcbf4b-66ac-4aad-a143-7a4ba0490564@gmail.com>
References: <58fcbf4b-66ac-4aad-a143-7a4ba0490564@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.8+dev; GNU Emacs 28.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 19:43:56 -0400
Message-ID: <15902.1713483836@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/jSHGOxcnS8gQPxSAHyyk0t7wEUI>
Subject: Re: [IPv6] Request for WG adoption call for draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 23:44:09 -0000

I have read draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui.  I agree with adopting it.
(note that anyone may call for adoption. chairs consult by tradition)

I did not know about this NMEA use case. Interesting.
I don't think the wireshark example is good/accurate, but perhaps the goal is
to show a category of tool.  Note that pcapng files can contain captured
traffic from multiple interfaces (not so for pcap), so in theory one might
need to qualify a filter.

>   Open Issue: This specification effectively extends RFC 4007.  Should
>   this be recorded as a formal update to RFC 4007?

Yes.

>   An implementation should not include ASCII NULL characters in a zone
>   identifier string as this could cause inconsistencies in subsequent
>   string processing.

Do we need to repeat that it's limited to 7-bit alphanumber?
(Do we say this in 4007? probably. but, worth repeating here)
I assume *$%43 is not valid as a zone ID.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email