IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPv6] Request for WG adoption call for draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 19 April 2024 05:44 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61CBCC14CEED for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 22:44:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.888
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.888 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id diBtqkyJ11VV for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 22:43:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81C35C14F6FA for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 22:43:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (p5dc5d931.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.197.217.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4VLNqW39F9zDCbh; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 07:43:51 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.500.171.1.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <7ded9a0e-b93f-4821-ac07-b3edbd064c6e@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 07:43:40 +0200
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <99F3F3B9-E36F-4072-ADFC-6A8C692BB54D@tzi.org>
References: <58fcbf4b-66ac-4aad-a143-7a4ba0490564@gmail.com> <15902.1713483836@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <613e475a-0582-4308-8eaf-eb39536355da@gmail.com> <C14B4DE0-D033-4917-B8A6-B5A285389958@tzi.org> <7ded9a0e-b93f-4821-ac07-b3edbd064c6e@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.500.171.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/rgKegoaSEDdXGWZtG4XFS6a8ONI>
Subject: Re: [IPv6] Request for WG adoption call for draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:44:03 -0000

On 19. Apr 2024, at 07:06, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> If we do that, the main question is ASCII vs UTF-8. It was pointed out during the URI discussion saga that if we want human-readable names, many humans would prefer their own script rather than the one assumed by RFC 20. That way lies a long and complicated discussion that could import I18N into the network stack.

(Not really until you bring language tags into the picture, which you need to actually make Han-unified Unicode characters human-readable.)

"humans would prefer” sounds like a desirable, a nice-to-have, something one would consider in a new design.
What is actually deployed?

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email