Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-icmp-limits-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 09 March 2020 16:15 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A87573A1391; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 09:15:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-6man-icmp-limits@ietf.org, 6man-chairs@ietf.org, ipv6@ietf.org, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, bob.hinden@gmail.com
Subject: Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-icmp-limits-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.120.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Message-ID: <158377052067.5643.16422181235678900244@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 09:15:20 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/pWKIzJPRJLfarQm9rr6vZJnSGyk>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 16:15:21 -0000
Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-6man-icmp-limits-07: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-icmp-limits/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The intended status needs to be changed to Proposed Standard before approval. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Please incorporate the edits from the Gen-ART review. == Section 1.1 == "Per [RFC8200], except for Hop by Hop options, extension headers are not examined or processed by intermediate nodes. Many intermediate nodes, however, do examine extension header for various purposes." This is slightly confusing. I think it would be better to say: "Per [RFC8200], except for Hop by Hop options, extension headers are not examined or processed by intermediate nodes. However, in deployed networks many intermediate nodes do examine extension headers for various purposes."
- Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-icmp-l… Alissa Cooper via Datatracker