Apology

Lee Howard <lee@asgard.org> Thu, 21 February 2019 20:36 UTC

Return-Path: <lee@asgard.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC0B113117E for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 12:36:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1tO74RXpyFA3 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 12:36:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from atl4mhob06.registeredsite.com (atl4mhob06.registeredsite.com [209.17.115.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C8A1130E7F for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 12:36:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailpod.hostingplatform.com (atl4qobmail03pod6.registeredsite.com [10.30.71.211]) by atl4mhob06.registeredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x1LKaD27023060 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 15:36:16 -0500
Received: (qmail 17298 invoked by uid 0); 21 Feb 2019 20:36:12 -0000
X-TCPREMOTEIP: 108.48.167.207
X-Authenticated-UID: lee@asgard.org
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.245?) (lee@asgard.org@108.48.167.207) by 0 with ESMTPA; 21 Feb 2019 20:36:12 -0000
To: ipv6@ietf.org
From: Lee Howard <lee@asgard.org>
Subject: Apology
Message-ID: <7d6009ff-bb1a-df18-99c6-6ba1dbbdccfe@asgard.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 15:36:12 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/qf7EJDfp2ikeKAhFZgXm9-Vdhxw>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 20:36:20 -0000

The other day, I had some harsh words for Ole. I apologize.

I have strong opinions on parts of this thread, and have not felt 
"heard," which is no excuse for my message to the list. I agree with Bob 
that I was unreasonable in my interpretation of Ole's position, and my 
email was unfair.

I respect Ole, and appreciate the depth of his knowledge and the 
significant contribution he makes and has made to this working group. I 
also like him, and have enjoyed discussion and collaboration with him. 
In this case, I let my frustration that we seemed not to be developing 
consensus color my response to him.

I'm sorry for degrading the conversation with that message. I will stay 
focused on the technical topics, and try to find ways to understand and 
be understood. If I have concerns about leadership in any part of the 
IETF in the future, I will raise those concerns privately. I'm sorry, 
Ole, for being a jerk to you.

Sincerely,

Lee Howard