Re: [irtf-discuss] Applied Networking Research Prize (ANRP) awards for IETF 109

Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> Wed, 30 September 2020 21:23 UTC

Return-Path: <csp@csperkins.org>
X-Original-To: irtf-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: irtf-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CE5D3A0BB0 for <irtf-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=csperkins.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z5Ih5OaGD5az for <irtf-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:23:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from haggis.mythic-beasts.com (haggis.mythic-beasts.com [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:86:1000:0:2:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42FA33A0B8F for <irtf-discuss@irtf.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:23:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=csperkins.org; s=mythic-beasts-k1; h=To:Date:From:Subject; bh=zVExEI/7PLNpBh8Kb8ogbvm9sW8RIT8NwRaoGTB0hEg=; b=fTugXk7lAi+JeTmpaTgdYhDH0O NH9amZ48PDl2M9UntTEDuQeR3pcLZ1+2P8GybF4Eod5i0VRWmJP7j4i2wf/Sc9QU5HJ9APUKqc3RO q04GIwPZESMlkPUndtXa3SCSoskM6t8urWVGIuhw2dLkgoO/vU/ccyVrptmcgfw2uLByBCyqw40gZ z67pygsmNDxgD+mkJh0ephQ1eZ+5l5Nutn6lYaetNQZmHNuJySzT+mEGiEi4q6su/hK5LPszffgAQ c9RWiKMmzBoZa7qM8dp0DFA3qnBnPLgK1pKzHJkoMefABLnlsT3TXJ6Y4NzadADBXlumooK0p23L/ M/cGi5IA==;
Received: from [81.187.2.149] (port=48567 helo=[192.168.0.67]) by haggis.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from <csp@csperkins.org>) id 1kNjZV-0004gY-KO; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 22:23:33 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.17\))
From: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
In-Reply-To: <973fbca0-ed94-6e39-e13f-b456aa4eed3c@csail.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 22:23:30 +0100
Cc: irtf-discuss@irtf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4C17CD4E-7702-441F-BA9B-71F6E612C7FF@csperkins.org>
References: <78D7C850-9CC9-4989-ADAC-8B45C143E428@csperkins.org> <15480B32-F3AF-43CB-A014-C0548EB23442@strayalpha.com> <F261BBB3-8334-41CC-AF10-26499F4E232E@sfc.wide.ad.jp> <8AC3D78B-47D4-4904-AA60-96C39FAD4A96@csperkins.org> <973fbca0-ed94-6e39-e13f-b456aa4eed3c@csail.mit.edu>
To: Philipp Richter <richterp@csail.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.17)
X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 4
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/irtf-discuss/0edpwrEkBZ7QCFlqO53LW1qNbcs>
Subject: Re: [irtf-discuss] Applied Networking Research Prize (ANRP) awards for IETF 109
X-BeenThere: irtf-discuss@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF general and new-work discussion list <irtf-discuss.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/irtf-discuss>, <mailto:irtf-discuss-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/irtf-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:irtf-discuss@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:irtf-discuss-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/irtf-discuss>, <mailto:irtf-discuss-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 21:23:38 -0000

Yes, certainly – sorry if that wasn’t clear. 

Colin



> On 30 Sep 2020, at 20:06, Philipp Richter <richterp@csail.mit.edu> wrote:
> 
> Broadening the scope of *nominations* could clearly help increasing the influx of interesting and relevant works.
> 
> Actual decisions on which nominated papers receive an *award*, however, should be based on the merit of the nominated papers, and their relevance to the IETF/IRTF, and not on preference (or non-preference) for specific venues.
> 
> Everything else would undermine the value of an ANRP award, and ultimately discourage people from nominating high-quality papers for an ANRP award.
> 
> (just my 2 cents)
> 
> --Philipp
> 
> On 30.09.20 11:15, Colin Perkins wrote:
>>> On 30 Sep 2020, at 00:07, Rodney Van Meter <rdv=40sfc.wide.ad.jp@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> As always, the *individuals* being awarded are highly worthy.  I have no complaints against them or their advisors or their work.
>>> 
>>> But when the *system* bubbles up from the same sources again and again, then a lot of *current* good work goes unrecognized, and the people and institutions on the margins aren’t encouraged, and new blood stops coming in.
>>> 
>>> I’m not tracking networking conferences as closely as I used to (ask me about quantum, though!), but I’ll try to check some of smaller venues for recent interesting work for this year’s nominations.  There are a lot of regional conferences and smaller workshops where, to be frank, much of the work counts as a good first step, but there are also gems out there.  It shouldn’t always be SIGCOMM, INFOCOM, NSDI.
>> Absolutely – the challenge is finding such venues, and the people who can identify and nominate the work that doesn’t reach the mainstream, but that might be interesting and relevant.
>> If you know of anyone that can help find such work, please put me, or one of the other award committee members, in touch with them, so we can try to broaden the pool of nominations.
>> And, equally, please suggest people to serve on the award committee in future years that can help widen its reach. We rotated some new people in this year, but I know we can broaden it still further.
>> Colin
>>> Again, congrats to this time’s winners, good work!
>>> 
>>> —Rod
>>> 
>>> Rodney Van Meter
>>> rdv@sfc.wide.ad.jp
>>> Professor, Faculty of Environment and Information Studies, Keio University, Japan
>>> 
>>>> On Sep 29, 2020, at 7:57, Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi, Colin,
>>>> 
>>>> FWIW, it would be nice if these awards didn’t constantly seem to go to groups already heavily entrenched in the IETF (granted the students are new, but the advisors don’t seem to be).
>>>> 
>>>> Joe
>>>> 
>>> 
> 



-- 
Colin Perkins
https://csperkins.org/