Re: [irtf-discuss] Applied Networking Research Prize (ANRP) awards for IETF 109

[Arjuna Sathiaseelan <[e-mail]>]

+1

On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 at 00:08, Rodney Van Meter <rdv=
[e-mail]> wrote:

> As always, the *individuals* being awarded are highly worthy.  I have no
> complaints against them or their advisors or their work.
>
> But when the *system* bubbles up from the same sources again and again,
> then a lot of *current* good work goes unrecognized, and the people and
> institutions on the margins aren’t encouraged, and new blood stops coming
> in.
>
> I’m not tracking networking conferences as closely as I used to (ask me
> about quantum, though!), but I’ll try to check some of smaller venues for
> recent interesting work for this year’s nominations.  There are a lot of
> regional conferences and smaller workshops where, to be frank, much of the
> work counts as a good first step, but there are also gems out there.  It
> shouldn’t always be SIGCOMM, INFOCOM, NSDI.
>
> Again, congrats to this time’s winners, good work!
>
> —Rod
>
> Rodney Van Meter
> [e-mail]
> Professor, Faculty of Environment and Information Studies, Keio
> University, Japan
>
> > On Sep 29, 2020, at 7:57, Joseph Touch <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Colin,
> >
> > FWIW, it would be nice if these awards didn’t constantly seem to go to
> groups already heavily entrenched in the IETF (granted the students are
> new, but the advisors don’t seem to be).
> >
> > Joe
> >
>
>

-- 

Arjuna Sathiaseelan | http://sathiaseelan.org