Re: [Isis-wg] draft-psarkar-isis-node-admin-tag-02 WG acceptance

Hi Les,

Thanks for the support. Please find few comments inline.

Regards,
-Pushpasis

On 9/29/14, 9:54 PM, "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com> wrote:

>I support making this a WG document - but I have the same concern which I
>previously expressed regarding the companion OSPF document i.e. a much
>more complete discussion regarding the tradeoffs between using node tags
>vs capability identifiers needs to be included .
[PS] IMO, defining capabilities will restrict the usage of node-admin-tags
to a finite number of use cases (as there can be only finite number of
capability definitions). We would not prefer to do that. We would prefer
the operators to use the node-admin-tags in as many number of use cases as
they want to. This way a node can be part of as many groups as the number
of values a 32-bit unsigned integer can generate. And the same
node-admin-tag value can be used for identifying groups by different
operators with different purpose in their own networks.

>
>As Hannes has referenced there has been a lively discussion of this point
>on the OSPF-WG list - all of which I think is applicable to the IS-IS
>draft. It would be good if any discussion of that issue in the future was
>copied to both lists.
>
>Also, I would prefer that the Applications content which is found in
>Section 5 of 
>http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag-02.txt be repeated
>in the IS-IS draft rather than referenced.
[PS] IMO, it does not make sense to duplicate text from the OSPF draft.
But then I am speaking more from a software developers perspective :)

>
>   Les
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Isis-wg [mailto:isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hannes
>> Gredler
>> Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 2:01 AM
>> To: isis-wg@ietf.org list
>> Cc: draft-psarkar-isis-node-admin-tag@tools.ietf.org; Christian Hopps
>> Subject: [Isis-wg] draft-psarkar-isis-node-admin-tag-02 WG acceptance
>> 
>> fellow ISIS-WG,
>> 
>> The authors have requested ISIS-WG draft-psarkar-isis-node-admin-tag-02
>> as a working group document.
>> 
>> note there has been already a decent level of discussion around
>> applicability and use
>> on the OSPF-WG mailing list. please see:
>> 
>>   http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/current/maillist.html
>>   grep for 'WG adoption of draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag'
>> 
>> please state support/no-support.
>> 
>> thanks,
>> 
>> hannes & chris
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Isis-wg mailing list
>> Isis-wg@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg