IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Isis-wg] New Layer2 extensions to ISIS - thorough review will be required

Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com> Mon, 26 April 2010 13:28 UTC

Return-Path: <stbryant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 354E73A6A8C for <isis-wg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 06:28:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.201, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A2OR2N--L07n for <isis-wg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 06:28:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com (rtp-iport-1.cisco.com [64.102.122.148]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1682C28C0E0 for <isis-wg@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 06:27:40 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: rtp-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.52,273,1270425600"; d="scan'208";a="105098916"
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com ([64.102.124.13]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 26 Apr 2010 13:27:28 +0000
Received: from cisco.com (mrwint.cisco.com [64.103.71.48]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o3QDRQGm021720; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 13:27:27 GMT
Received: from stbryant-mac2.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cisco.com (8.11.7p3+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id o3QDRN616778; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:27:24 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <4BD594BB.4020708@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:27:23 +0100
From: Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Fedyk, Donald (Don)" <donald.fedyk@alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <E5AACC79-7A9A-4315-86DF-8E27268EA20D@juniper.net> <60C093A41B5E45409A19D42CF7786DFD4F9969AE14@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se> <D3F33DCB7804274A890F9215F86616580AC5C7DB78@USNAVSXCHMBSC2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <D3F33DCB7804274A890F9215F86616580AC5C7DB78@USNAVSXCHMBSC2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Christian Hopps <chopps@rawdofmt.org>, isis-wg <isis-wg@ietf.org>, Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>, Adrian Farrel <Adrian.Farrel@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] New Layer2 extensions to ISIS - thorough review will be required
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isis-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 13:28:38 -0000

> > From and 802.1aq standpoint we are happy with no new PDUs.  IS-IS carries multiple address families to date, a capability that we wanted to leverage.
Are the changes required by 802.1aq limited to simply adding (sub)TLVs 
to carry additional address families with no other changes whatsoever 
required to the protocol?

- Stewart

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email