Re: [Isms] Last Call: rfc5953 (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Transport Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)) to Draft Standard
Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Tue, 03 May 2011 14:18 UTC
Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: isms@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isms@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 892A6E0826 for <isms@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 May 2011 07:18:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SvkAkJX497+v for <isms@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 May 2011 07:18:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.236.43]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE17FE0684 for <isms@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 May 2011 07:18:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (wjh.hardakers.net [10.0.0.2]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E84519A; Tue, 3 May 2011 07:18:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
References: <20110419211456.203DAE084A@ietfc.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20110430150731.029f3fd8@resistor.net> <4DBEC59F.2030902@ieca.com>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 07:18:03 -0700
In-Reply-To: <4DBEC59F.2030902@ieca.com> (Sean Turner's message of "Mon, 02 May 2011 16:54:23 +0200")
Message-ID: <sdr58fq350.fsf@wjh.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Cc: isms@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Isms] Last Call: rfc5953 (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Transport Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)) to Draft Standard
X-BeenThere: isms@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the ISMS working group <isms.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isms>, <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isms>
List-Post: <mailto:isms@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms>, <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 14:18:34 -0000
>>>>> On Mon, 02 May 2011 16:54:23 +0200, Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com> said: ST> FYI I also asked about setting the UseSTD3ASCIIRules flag and Pete ST> said it was completely unnecessary as far as he could tell. That's ST> why I just dropped it. FYI, that was required by something or someone. I'll need to look through history to figure out why I put it in there. It certainly wasn't because "I thought it needed to be". I'm admittedly fairly clueless when it comes to the proper ways to specify internationalization and the text in the document came from multiple discussions. -- Wes Hardaker Cobham Analytic Solutions
- [Isms] Last Call: rfc5953 (Transport Layer Securi… The IESG
- Re: [Isms] Last Call: rfc5953 (Transport Layer Se… Sean Turner
- Re: [Isms] Last Call: rfc5953 (Transport Layer Se… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [Isms] Last Call: rfc5953 (Transport Layer Se… SM
- Re: [Isms] Last Call: rfc5953 (Transport Layer Se… Sean Turner
- Re: [Isms] Last Call: rfc5953 (Transport Layer Se… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [Isms] Last Call: rfc5953 (Transport Layer Se… Sean Turner
- Re: [Isms] Last Call: rfc5953 (Transport Layer Se… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [Isms] Last Call: rfc5953 (Transport Layer Se… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [Isms] Last Call: rfc5953 (Transport Layer Se… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [Isms] Last Call: rfc5953 (Transport Layer Se… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [Isms] Last Call: rfc5953 (Transport Layer Se… Sean Turner
- Re: [Isms] Last Call: rfc5953 (Transport Layer Se… Wes Hardaker