IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ipwave] Should the IPWAVE WG adopt draft-jeong-ipwave-vehicular-networking-survey?

Nabil Benamar <benamar73@gmail.com> Tue, 06 June 2017 14:57 UTC

Return-Path: <benamar73@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD74B129474 for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 07:57:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.489
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.489 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10=0.26, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wpoWCc5kdCKg for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 07:57:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22a.google.com (mail-qt0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E9631293EC for <its@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 07:57:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id u12so109199383qth.0 for <its@ietf.org>; Tue, 06 Jun 2017 07:57:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=u1ONjdAx6+bwDR+ev/4Xwges36NOUj2Y8VttL8h0iZs=; b=EYazRp0JtQdSRjyPu8posViPljGID7vdcYvf+VZSs3j8qqwiju0jxTRLDfV1Y/CpSz oGOLLzqbCw+oLy4VWWDypCSjz1ZRofUsOgQYmoaDGU/pMejuPl+PwfV8Jd2oL+v2Eagq tUv7sAtnnJTWCyh+3EjbYEq0mlKI8rHnaLTNNrWsRe24VAstf+RZWASct/G2jXYQ1tO1 VD/XLmi48bPjX+STZMXRBgbRIm7KiZe6pHHmdxpDiv5vcC4dzUFhY5bmkKkFY78QosSG dQMkcO+/pnRCjrY5bycjmMK9qiNlnv+QHa3v1XDWFNOgn9QOonSUDOT2HLS5DhphROH+ sUAQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=u1ONjdAx6+bwDR+ev/4Xwges36NOUj2Y8VttL8h0iZs=; b=uhDLWIRn0XpyMK20AT4uV/C4tcOA59Flql2AVrwo4/N74nzS7yWiOaoXXoA/w9xgqc vTx/J2cNgeb00b9vljQX+oiKkOPL3YVXVydIXfKrBxKh7ErvvhaJJmicl8yAgunhz71J fyAoyyO+EOJhuSdi9bDfRLwacLguMFaHcMYkyj22qQqSvZQj/ohArKWhkOXzHZkB9ssH hrOtCbMtim2wyg7XpyVEqDS1QTVu9Ih2T6SB9Af04s0kp3J9BQ33UfZajY5qhhynBHbK j6t2pCaU4F966iYuoH2ee1EDgfvtxxPEugrHy9T/jtedZqPsODK2hG/znprErJUi8Zdm rbSA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOzK7g1Lc7gMTBRNB+WRNTmxaYvtmZuj5VWeq1f/K0x+RTV3J0FC BQcW9QZvGIzd1mQhl5OCJwzutSCfCA==
X-Received: by 10.55.50.19 with SMTP id y19mr30739810qky.24.1496761036408; Tue, 06 Jun 2017 07:57:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.144.5 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 07:57:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.12.144.5 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 07:57:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <277c0b18-6d0e-53d2-d38d-eeb80deb20fc@gmail.com>
References: <CA50A382-F591-4A33-BAF9-1903E107BE02@vigilsec.com> <277c0b18-6d0e-53d2-d38d-eeb80deb20fc@gmail.com>
From: Nabil Benamar <benamar73@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 14:57:14 +0000
Message-ID: <CAMugd_XJkUnygmC2jK9pMBHvL7KFFd7KQieB2guNA3oDyu+KGg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Cc: its@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1146f198e38ab105514bd520"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/2jQnQuqspwzjYcSY-pbtrx39ucI>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] Should the IPWAVE WG adopt draft-jeong-ipwave-vehicular-networking-survey?
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 14:57:19 -0000

I support the adoption of this draft.

Best regards
Nabil



On Jun 6, 2017 14:27, "Alexandre Petrescu" <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I support adoption.
>
> The 'Intended status' on the first page should say INFORMATIONAL.
>
> Maybe some other use-cases could be added, or no.
>
> Alex
>
> Le 06/06/2017 à 15:59, Russ Housley a écrit :
>
>> The IPWAVE WG charter calls for the group to publish an Informational
>> document:
>>
>>    This group will work on an informational document
>>    that will explain the state of the art in the field and describe
>>    the use cases that will use IPv6 in order to focus the work of
>>    the group.
>>
>> Should the IPWAVE WG adopt draft-jeong-ipwave-vehicular-networking-survey
>> as the starting point for this deliverable?
>>
>> See https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jeong-ipwave-vehicula
>> r-networking-survey/
>>
>> Russ
>> _______________________________________________
>> its mailing list
>> its@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> its mailing list
> its@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email