IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ipwave] Should the IPWAVE WG adopt draft-jeong-ipwave-vehicular-networking-survey?

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Sat, 01 July 2017 16:29 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C91C4129482 for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Jul 2017 09:29:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aeN_7_piAwJB for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Jul 2017 09:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x229.google.com (mail-qt0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30BBE1267BB for <its@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Jul 2017 09:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x229.google.com with SMTP id i2so119119336qta.3 for <its@ietf.org>; Sat, 01 Jul 2017 09:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YpKL1Zv/7YEXK8VaA0KVDeuvkVvXiEXXSA4TuVSxi7E=; b=uarHqEn5VoK/xFZBx2gkvWnf+WLKQN2Cau5Z4kNG3qvVske3X2E5QLhyspUuYqj8dx CQAeriHV51UZwrXJCqwC4DBysZ+DvhoTewXNUkydQb48+pYjbyE0knfO1mxVjJ4eZiFk CLdmQ3KdoJa977NqXMFbE05KsShxbalQJZqGH/G4vX4iDq9SZP0UUIb7PerURIIpnxF7 mZnFJk4jevsxqs6MRkX9tri4eXzu4Ku5qAacdHi+IjFBJlIolc+L/BW3jCvqRpFoeoIz DfAsFOJHfwib9drPKhPPxYiVYI9A0tTDdwQv5LgZYgFEJsr9oROcaTdo+x31Nv/NzNOh QZHQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YpKL1Zv/7YEXK8VaA0KVDeuvkVvXiEXXSA4TuVSxi7E=; b=YaVlE7868Vgbe8vahDY01DMuQElldSufAZR95nJzxXsRYloZqsQ3rdJCUC23P01dlG /E4REFPAAjw89xoHsyfUHCtzpYc9J5TvVOOi2kcvvm6QjNy83Nhw3Vn+QYoKMG+FP4iA 2YRIn3poED7hSLmC6MzFh0Xbj8bsYYLFIeCiU+Ij48Ybsz81o++BiR0xMEFkErV9M4Pd 0h1o+WoWRMaRWU6T/G6+5zNbT+r1R0N7xQyZEft4z8fEHPn5NvTK2C+YPeIURlWlnOd+ Yxb91rtkMQVVq4eW9X6sJnPHSmPFm8HgPb1az7th5EHqbHgMWdXw/MSH67110vHpC3BG wwbw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOyIMQe5kfA3YUQadW5iX9fUdtuwTq9Kq75pJsbFWc9vlrUFBhwG 2Fh8S7GJgkLZMMFE+tjnbnJeBiVIew==
X-Received: by 10.237.62.58 with SMTP id l55mr32390580qtf.20.1498926549395; Sat, 01 Jul 2017 09:29:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.88.213 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Jul 2017 09:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA50A382-F591-4A33-BAF9-1903E107BE02@vigilsec.com>
References: <CA50A382-F591-4A33-BAF9-1903E107BE02@vigilsec.com>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2017 18:29:08 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnDZ89K+WDTmbbqDReW9gZrwBAwWcr1s1Yy_ENCJ6PiRR5j-Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: its <its@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1144de9a856dd705534408f3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/dNDwMfSZuUwuxwPHQKoKib0u4Sg>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] Should the IPWAVE WG adopt draft-jeong-ipwave-vehicular-networking-survey?
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2017 16:29:12 -0000

yes support the draft, thanks

AB

On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:

> The IPWAVE WG charter calls for the group to publish an Informational
> document:
>
>    This group will work on an informational document
>    that will explain the state of the art in the field and describe
>    the use cases that will use IPv6 in order to focus the work of
>    the group.
>
> Should the IPWAVE WG adopt draft-jeong-ipwave-vehicular-networking-survey
> as the starting point for this deliverable?
>
> See https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jeong-ipwave-
> vehicular-networking-survey/
>
> Russ
> _______________________________________________
> its mailing list
> its@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email