IETF Logo Mail Archive

[ipwave] Should the IPWAVE WG adopt draft-jeong-ipwave-vehicular-networking-survey?

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Tue, 06 June 2017 13:59 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D2A51292FC for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 06:59:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ly5NU5AyWV3R for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 06:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (x-bolt-wan.smeinc.net [209.135.219.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2285D128DE7 for <its@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 06:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 834B630048E for <its@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 09:59:32 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id hsjrOhPSeCbB for <its@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 09:59:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.home (pool-108-45-101-150.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.45.101.150]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 98C93300429 for <its@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 09:59:31 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Message-Id: <CA50A382-F591-4A33-BAF9-1903E107BE02@vigilsec.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 09:59:31 -0400
To: its <its@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/PA3zZpHF0I9GT9iWTVV6WXLvo-U>
Subject: [ipwave] Should the IPWAVE WG adopt draft-jeong-ipwave-vehicular-networking-survey?
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 13:59:37 -0000

The IPWAVE WG charter calls for the group to publish an Informational document:

   This group will work on an informational document
   that will explain the state of the art in the field and describe
   the use cases that will use IPv6 in order to focus the work of
   the group.

Should the IPWAVE WG adopt draft-jeong-ipwave-vehicular-networking-survey
as the starting point for this deliverable?

See https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jeong-ipwave-vehicular-networking-survey/

Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email