IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ipwave] Should the IPWAVE WG adopt draft-jeong-ipwave-vehicular-networking-survey?

Chris Shen <shenyiwen7@gmail.com> Wed, 21 June 2017 04:54 UTC

Return-Path: <shenyiwen7@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531AA1242F5 for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 21:54:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.748
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.748 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5BvdJChg5wym for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 21:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot0-x22b.google.com (mail-ot0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81DAB12EC58 for <its@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 21:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id y47so82001176oty.0 for <its@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 21:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=jqs3b5dEIplwrQzBrxctA92fsJo8AedNjCv0znWlkqA=; b=DKcHoWRnJ3vmmOkkGtAVKzKQpKJBmwDBIAvgLKJFp7vRJ86dMMaJ9h44TgfUZKPWA8 x9rD8GYy65nCuglMo+LUhOZfH1t9rf6y3KFUlB0GSDQ3c/OTvsCk00uULUj33IWXfO4V TbNs4uMAiKp0bL+jx+qCrbZbTSrWCr6QdRb18SBNlFO9e1iZeNb/3ONaMBWDxUIK9JMt WCJkAwC5vsNIq6yyPuykskshEILeFtjCHKtQlKxUxae+GlILoOKhBxVKmUmkcP2JAbkO lGjwLg46tD/3DpoUqFA9/1tSGJsGEqXPnc3fpXm8PIit/KCdGc9G7ZjvhAahKGHlIbIY XGTQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jqs3b5dEIplwrQzBrxctA92fsJo8AedNjCv0znWlkqA=; b=KV3NQBTyhrPZ81GLZKIZIBEoq7RpJ4YZ/umLLUw+WNQLbihMPUX/p0SVV+Zbs4LOZL AzQUufw0qAMkolP+9b6VUfSbfvY3MJdXv7pDHmAPEMYOHoeGcVDHEakpUQau42he+Unw vKqe9LzeHW+q85TX6fGAB7J9eobE5Sz+Bbh8u8nX8ZitLV0u3uucwX/YVO3R9w+8I4eI BhnhZiLgSPXIxsqQEXKSdhoQm/M1cws6Mf0n5Kmp+u5ne3/MP5qNRQhHeIsytW9cmFmd V5MorA85Ix/+Nv+W460w3yDlIER26AXU8xMJdYr01gtxwmsvV59GSV2dskSIZ6JqKHjc i7HA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOwO0lbTb9e2Pu70x1zf6U9ee7pEyUJuie38LtQpldVNFZmjM2Gi Ok0x4d9xyLHDb6CjYfPxbkEPrwQ1PA==
X-Received: by 10.157.28.134 with SMTP id l6mr17698871ota.87.1498020840974; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 21:54:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.8.110 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 21:53:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA50A382-F591-4A33-BAF9-1903E107BE02@vigilsec.com>
References: <CA50A382-F591-4A33-BAF9-1903E107BE02@vigilsec.com>
From: Chris Shen <shenyiwen7@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 13:53:30 +0900
Message-ID: <CAL1T1NEQvahQ-Ge7F7h6rem=OU8HyuJMt+c37dbypj4=YFbd+A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: its <its@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f4030435c9b017b1a70552712816"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/fnEtxGqa19z2ovKJe1iZeWwN2n8>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] Should the IPWAVE WG adopt draft-jeong-ipwave-vehicular-networking-survey?
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 04:54:03 -0000

Hi, all:

I support the adoption of this draft.

Thanks,
Chris.

On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 10:59 PM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:

> The IPWAVE WG charter calls for the group to publish an Informational
> document:
>
>    This group will work on an informational document
>    that will explain the state of the art in the field and describe
>    the use cases that will use IPv6 in order to focus the work of
>    the group.
>
> Should the IPWAVE WG adopt draft-jeong-ipwave-vehicular-networking-survey
> as the starting point for this deliverable?
>
> See https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jeong-ipwave-vehicula
> r-networking-survey/
>
> Russ
> _______________________________________________
> its mailing list
> its@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its
>



-- 

Yiwen (Chris) Shen, Ph.D Candidate
IoT Lab: *http://iotlab.skku.edu <http://iotlab.skku.edu/>*
Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, South Korea
Mobile:+82-(0)10-6871-8103
Email: chrisshen@skku.edu

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email