IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Jmap] Benjamin Schwartz comments on draft-ietf-jmap-websocket-05

Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm> Wed, 18 March 2020 17:23 UTC

Return-Path: <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B603A1907 for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 10:23:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmail.fm header.b=j8Tsu4U5; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=bJ0J6fmF
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RIWNNj9Mn69j for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 10:23:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD46C3A1906 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 10:23:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7E3549D; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 13:23:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap21 ([10.202.2.71]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 18 Mar 2020 13:23:55 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to:cc :subject:content-type; s=fm2; bh=yGSLK6CdZVzSl4dDXUdUKFfNerumIkW rwIqkAhlQiwg=; b=j8Tsu4U55tVAThq9l7ZuLUVVWJS0Id+snieX1F6wbsDfTK/ TffXy+CuoImu22tB6hVF+JzW6fa7G440k3IGzyyHXrV8Jj7dE0ejy2BBo3Gg+DGC hLWx5MEPhdYKRBex/8jV4xXuUHGLZ5ievyPx1t83PpGicyrQnXPz4yEn/HAvNo/n SEqxQEvRvDoIm5FR9/PAeMrpEYF+Z656dSptsXAYplX41ybaZW4lGbxVQCEvt2lm 9jj0le03eNXrJFS90V8KQ43N70w6ach1UFZWWWXyudAZyDxBwv+tiUtnBAIOmzmR zcxmIS1eEBc5UPWTJ4P3zEv3+hyoYZOcGCPR47A==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=yGSLK6 CdZVzSl4dDXUdUKFfNerumIkWrwIqkAhlQiwg=; b=bJ0J6fmF5NMKmcRStRAcSz ILooFOc9FKU1ArqqfRMYxRVL+KIUV3G0lgAA77dGqcn4QF3BRv64q+I0qFAVgcTf a1z21iGZEOkl6sTSvsy5QUGbUXH/rB/4rxg94+fHQJmXJuJWgYzBy1qTpiR/vuwW p0739Dnkcw1ONgNgcnwK6EZ4F/OeXf1gYRqzuzM3R8gXdcZNmx5BYI6XDz+kH8Yz p4utbIb44dA6I6/tocNA2/Wc6kW6hxnmeLApXklf4ir/rlQeW7zq7hf5YMH/3Zv2 l9Ee9dfCwTBMgVbmP0tDx4uJ3XnznyqhycMiB8qLX5CafbPNc6gCVr7WxNyGQqxQ ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:KllyXkU0alRCC5TzcbBQTfoRI2_nwgf_7Ru7KaStIOlRxfJlqyHSoA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrudefjedgleejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesrgdtreerreerjeenucfhrhhomhepfdetlhgv gigvhicuofgvlhhnihhkohhvfdcuoegrrghmvghlnhhikhhovhesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrd hfmheqnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhep rggrmhgvlhhnihhkohhvsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrfhhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:KllyXqnGNmEAeSoLB2D0XCZi9Dr5Cp9gavcMtWhBtkjvdxpONyuBQg> <xmx:KllyXssg1f7QOEFeGLSx-rJcg417KO29vKRdqkR-1cDm8X5AcfeBgw> <xmx:KllyXrh0PWMtiOwxREVdp83IcaJTHyhQV_FUoCMSj8OzQbpOKKokIQ> <xmx:KllyXhjV22wIRhqnKYPBnM1WazTMDpq3NmSMJcFKUiBAP_nLYx-8Dw>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 47D46660069; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 13:23:54 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.7-991-g5a577d3-fmstable-20200305v3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <533b2c05-eda9-48df-8564-50e14e43acc3@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHbrMsCkCxkDHy92N1uFM7sG=DUTS9R+iQihyxU0xPt29jF7gg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <0f7388d8-b420-469f-8d5a-da5fb0bcf27a@www.fastmail.com> <2cc03bd6-48e3-3953-f9ba-59fbc26054a7@fastmail.com> <CAHbrMsCkCxkDHy92N1uFM7sG=DUTS9R+iQihyxU0xPt29jF7gg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 17:23:27 +0000
From: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
To: Benjamin Schwartz <bemasc@google.com>, Ken Murchison <murch@fastmail.com>
Cc: jmap@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="8d73a3d9df374c8c8663380fa88f3564"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/MxkduakLhvJ14-yQt1CxXkAzPJs>
Subject: Re: [Jmap] Benjamin Schwartz comments on draft-ietf-jmap-websocket-05
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 17:23:57 -0000

Hi Ken,

On Mon, Mar 9, 2020, at 8:02 PM, Ben Schwartz wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 3:16 PM Ken Murchison <murch@fastmail.com> wrote:
>> On 2/21/20 7:45 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:

>>> ## Section 4.3.2


Is “@type” now required on all Request/Response/Problem Details objects everywhere?  Does this update RFC 8620?
>> 

>> Alexey, I'll let you decide is this document updates RFC 8620.

> My point is that the text is unclear. I presume that the line "This specification adds two extra arguments to the Request object" doesn't apply to all Request objects, but only to Request objects that are sent over a WebSocket. However, the text doesn't say that. I would suggest noting that this specification uses an extended object encoding from RFC 8620, so that the distinction can be described explicitly.
I think clarifying whether this is a generic extension or WebSocket specific, would be useful.

Best Regards,
Alexey

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email