Re: [Jmap] Adding the Message::isForwarded property

Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmail.fm> Tue, 02 May 2017 00:32 UTC

Return-Path: <brong@fastmail.fm>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB567128616 for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 May 2017 17:32:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.719
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.719 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmail.fm header.b=at1qDig/; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=QiPOx4D+
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HzvQCSbu0o8K for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 May 2017 17:32:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FC5212EB5A for <jmap@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 May 2017 17:29:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A70207A8 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 May 2017 20:29:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from web2 ([10.202.2.212]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 01 May 2017 20:29:51 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=7WxwG4wSHVkf1mzEelFn4Bwht/QwT 5KHzqW1h1SkM3g=; b=at1qDig/7SKaeX1tsMwssnmBEfSLtXSb97gq1yDGGimTD 2wlQ7nrWmdm1h0bZmiTqBhLN7sruW+j7f1BhLYkE9zuoz7/QHKmCqPm8uH0OLr/3 zAqUxX8DpKA5bKE1Pqr98oEYDPHqUFfSO0FZBCyTWvJdoeqrdCSc6FiELrCU3Hsj 2b7F+zYion+04jbD5kjWLAedXoM9Ew9nGISsMt7QiPPAvfIZ+NpidygMe/tvHDhw Q74qKCDTTtnbzF86yBQGxyUl9uRuU11gyJWmcwe6EZnbxRbXUP24JGD2MnpQ7xER QKQy4IHC0rLUzKgMO3/hiNAtqCzPXuHRlsihMg3eQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=7WxwG4 wSHVkf1mzEelFn4Bwht/QwT5KHzqW1h1SkM3g=; b=QiPOx4D+7eNKTwIp8c4mA3 ditu92cJm4LR6V/1+uUfP11EslHVwQfmpbq8FdgOX7/FPwv8qB20wNiqCYVOIkyW /+i+m8oP6tfV2UPwgbd3Xz0quW8MXj1vjBXhAXZvDeUQr0+khYEdmsqaVyGawLrt y8u7pYhgE5tal/L/nBu+x//X0pPd42zaOi8HQJL4DvgEmlbwji4R8PlW/qvG8Ul5 6NacEoiCEd5WQCxGWjIf49qgi1pVNGJq8awaHtxzp/q68MSxRuBH0ftrOGsUKLk/ TCGaISKuw8FpdckjyDSV+tipXGyiE1jRKVXQpzGe7OabxeZjCbPeOASzAu2Eohng ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:_9IHWbgauKsVIDsKCY_qUAbgz5_x8NjbatCiPA0jR4Ba7z6DB274sQ>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id C809162704; Mon, 1 May 2017 20:29:51 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <1493684991.1823524.962425856.6AFAFD99@webmail.messagingengine.com>
From: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmail.fm>
To: jmap@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-88a795dc
In-Reply-To: <CD185881-CE7F-416C-9D5F-14E45AFEABEB@att.com>
Date: Tue, 02 May 2017 10:29:51 +1000
References: <148716911729.17277.15371202023742081890.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <b7ec34d3-3aaf-82af-3663-5b0966c83ff0@dcrocker.net> <b5753f7f-92f9-50dd-42f0-ce0de7360e08@linagora.com> <A9EDBE7D-4E3D-45C2-BB97-F74AC9DB9486@oracle.com> <9eb1fd3c-8868-9d24-6c30-46d333b69fef@isode.com> <3c1711a2-46dd-db1c-506e-5e1ad89ce56d@linagora.com> <92769755-62c6-7257-ce3d-7d0b5699735d@isode.com> <27c62cc8-68e0-49b5-4900-34c26d7b4c6a@linagora.com> <C88A669A-2143-4FC2-81EF-3C9A2CD5963B@apple.com> <D0072AC9-71DC-4831-A3DA-FEA4A7B85BBA@oracle.com> <AB5279CE-4F9A-4DE8-AEEA-E1425D04FA89@att.com> <1492581452.3025596.948906456.71780673@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1A7624AF-2FD9-4FE8-A29D-23BFADEED04B@apple.com> <1493360522.1171603.959013464.217C003E@webmail.messagingengine.com> <9FA9B645-EAE3-412C-923A-77B0987E70B4@oracle.com> <CD185881-CE7F-416C-9D5F-14E45AFEABEB@att.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/hcPHd19Epo2N_EXF3Z6rOwUx5-E>
Subject: Re: [Jmap] Adding the Message::isForwarded property
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 May 2017 00:32:09 -0000

On Tue, 2 May 2017, at 03:44, HANSEN, TONY L wrote:
> On 5/1/17, 12:50 PM, "Jmap on behalf of Chris Newman" <jmap-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of chris.newman@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
>     On 27 Apr 2017, at 23:22, Neil Jenkins wrote:
>     > Firstly, I think we should map the 4 \System flags to $System in JMAP.
>     > Using backslash is a real pain because it is an escape character in
>     > JSON, so examples in the spec are confusing if nothing else! Changing 
>     > it
>     > to $ would make the system keywords consistent with the IANA 
>     > registered
>     > keywords, which I believe will be less confusing for developers coming
>     > in without an IMAP background. The only issue would be what to do if
>     > someone has added "$Flagged" etc. user keywords on an IMAP server. 
>     > This
>     > seems unlikely to be much of a real-world occurrence to me, on the 
>     > basis
>     > it would have been very confusing, but I think we can just specify 
>     > that
>     > these keywords are not visible over JMAP.
>     
>     If you choose to map \System to $System, I'd suggest making the JMAP 
>     specification IANA considerations section register the four $System 
>     flags in the IMAP keyword registry as "names reserved for use by JMAP; 
>     use in IMAP not recommended". I'd also suggest renaming the registry to 
>     "IMAP/JMAP keywords" or "IMAP keywords and JMAP flags" (depending on 
>     terminology you want to use).
> 
> Concur. Note: this would also add an “Updates: 5788” to the spec.

Have added comments to the effect of both of these things to the ticket about keywords:

https://github.com/jmapio/jmap/issues/73

Bron.

-- 
  Bron Gondwana
  brong@fastmail.fm