Re: [jose] Keys in the documents

["Jim Schaad" <[e-mail]>]

I have gone through the process of trying to use this, and I have also sat
down to think about how I would like to use the examples and I would suggest
the following:

 

There be one or two JWK sets that are defined at the start of appendix A.  

 

.         All of the keys (public, private and secret) be included in the
JWK sets

.         We assign, for testing purposes, a URL to each of the JWK sets
defined

.         Each example then either has the necessary data to find the key
from the correct JWK Set (and possibly the correct JWK Set via a jku) or the
text defines which of the keys is to be used.

.         There should be examples of many (most? All?) of the key location
methods between the JWS and JWE drafts.

 

Jim

 

 

From: Mike Jones [mailto:[e-mail]] 
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 8:58 AM
To: Matt Miller (mamille2); Richard Barnes
Cc: Jim Schaad; [e-mail];
[e-mail]
Subject: RE: [jose] Keys in the documents

 

Will do.

  _____  

From: Matt Miller (mamille2)
Sent: 6/21/2013 6:06 AM
To: Richard Barnes
Cc: Jim Schaad; [e-mail];
[e-mail]
Subject: Re: [jose] Keys in the documents

+1

On Jun 20, 2013, at 8:48 PM, Richard Barnes <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> +1
> 
> On Thursday, June 20, 2013, Jim Schaad wrote:
> 
>> Is there any reason not to provide the public and private keys in the
>> appendixes as JWK objects?  This would make them easier to understand and
>> put them into a format that one expects to be understood by JOSE
systems.*
>> ***
>> 
>> ** **
>> 
>> Jim****
>> 
>> ** **
>> 

- m&m

Matt Miller < [e-mail] >
Cisco Systems, Inc.