Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #12: Should the x5c field be removed from JWE?, ,

[Matias Woloski <[e-mail]>]

1.

In some cases, it is simpler for me to just put the whole base64 public
key. For instance, in some platforms is not straightforward to parse an
X509 cert and extract the serial number, hence being able to send the
public key blob there, makes it easier for interop.


On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Anthony Nadalin <[e-mail]>wrote:

> 1
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of
> Mike Jones
> Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 8:23 AM
> To: [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #12: Should the
> x5c field be removed from JWE?, ,
>
> 1.  Retain the "x5c" header parameter in JWE.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of
> Roland Hedberg
> Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2013 12:22 PM
> To: [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #12: Should the
> x5c field be removed from JWE?, ,
>
> +1
>
> 12 apr 2013 kl. 08:32 skrev [e-mail]:
>
> 1
>
> x5c is the most explicit way to describe which private key is the right
> one. It is an alternative to kid which is another reason why  kid must not
> be mandatory.
>
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of
> Karen O'Donoghue
> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 1:59 AM
> To: [e-mail]
> Subject: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #12: Should the x5c
> field be removed from JWE?, ,
>
> Issue #12 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/12 suggests
> removing the "x5c" header parameter from JWE, saying that no use case for
> it has emerged.  The same logic may apply to other key specification
> parameters for JWE.
>
>
> Which of these best describes your preferences on this issue?
> 1.  Retain the "x5c" header parameter in JWE.
> 2.  Remove the "x5c" header parameter (and possibly other related key
> specification parameters) from JWE.
> 3.  Another resolution (please specify in detail).
> 0.  I need more information to decide.
>
> Your reply is requested by Friday, April 19th or earlier.
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
>
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
>