Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at least on key indicator be mandatory

1.  Yes - Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than
the JWS and JWE headers ARE important.

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Anthony Nadalin <tonynad@microsoft.com>wrote:

> 1.  Yes - Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than
> the JWS and JWE headers ARE important.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jose-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:jose-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Mike Jones
> Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 8:25 AM
> To: odonoghue@isoc.org
> Cc: jose@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at
> least on key indicator be mandatory
>
> 1.  Yes - Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than
> the JWS and JWE headers ARE important.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roland Hedberg [mailto:roland.hedberg@adm.umu.se]
> Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2013 1:33 AM
> To: odonoghue@isoc.org
> Cc: jose@ietf.org; Mike Jones
> Subject: Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at
> least on key indicator be mandatory
>
> I support 1 as defined by Mike.
>
> 12 apr 2013 kl. 07:25 skrev Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>:
>
> > 1.  Yes - Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other
> than the JWS and JWE headers ARE important
>
> -- Roland
>
> From: Mike Jones
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 10:25 PM
> To: 'odonoghue@isoc.org'; jose@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at
> least on key indicator be mandatory
>
> Reading this question, I believe that there's a possibility for the
> question to be misinterpreted, since the sense of the question in the
> subject is opposite of the sense of the question in the body.  I believe
> that the intent of 1 and 2 were as follows:
>
> 1.  Yes - Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than
> the JWS and JWE headers ARE important.
> 2.  No - Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than
> the JWS and JWE headers ARE NOT important.
>
> Maybe people could reply with 1 and 2 as above, so that their answers to
> the question of whether these use cases are important are not are
> unambiguous.
>
>                                                             -- Mike
>
> From: jose-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:jose-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Karen O'Donoghue
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 5:00 PM
> To: jose@ietf.org
> Subject: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at
> least on key indicator be mandatory
>
> Issue #15 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/15. suggests
> requiring that a key indicator, such as a "kid" field, be required in all
> JWS and JWE headers. Are use cases where key information is exchanged by
> means other than the JWS or JWE headers important?
> Which of these best describes your preferences on this issue?
> 1.  Yes.
> 2.   No.
> 0.  I need more information to decide.
>
> Your reply is requested by Friday, April 19th (or earlier).
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> jose@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> jose@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
>