IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at least on key indicator be mandatory

Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com> Fri, 12 April 2013 00:22 UTC

Return-Path: <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7202121F851C for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:22:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.49
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.49 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.108, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fe7tBdj8Sb71 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:22:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-f179.google.com (mail-pd0-f179.google.com [209.85.192.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D4F21F8517 for <jose@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:22:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f179.google.com with SMTP id x11so1112029pdj.38 for <jose@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:22:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :cc:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=WNcrKwn4lBzpTZ1a1UrCtwjoeGFXojbbjNfMdKupba0=; b=cn3u9DbzJhdv3nzx/1n7OFDy5F8++/Wz/Tiz/VG84cKL2VF5SoLUCYm7V/dpdyyx4E /jEFBm1c4H50ISqcncoYv/ia21XNG76cYw2UhnrHCJFOMceM151ONZZktO01GIcxay89 PBQZE3v3wsfJOR/1qscTfxjUfYV8oXLnByFJkhzXWKHBzUAFfZxKpBFrYxoDEKLZT0gJ UiM16YV6y/cSksUA4m8vTK0jKAk10WaoYitNBJxEU9R1PQRtwyxjTRUZbjyZOeth64uz 2kzKfo/ZF3AxYUH38GMFlVBWyVi4h2a+gzF67VvsLPdFgBCkYk+7wmhWL3SCIAlEO3P5 QzXw==
X-Received: by 10.66.144.170 with SMTP id sn10mr480508pab.42.1365726135595; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:22:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.80] (c-98-210-193-30.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [98.210.193.30]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c5sm17394pbl.37.2013.04.11.17.22.12 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:22:13 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E841D930-5EAF-4BDE-A580-7196B9B87A86"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <51674E63.3050809@isoc.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:22:11 -0700
Message-Id: <EBAC9CD9-9A03-47D3-95AF-492E28C3AA56@gmail.com>
References: <51674E63.3050809@isoc.org>
To: odonoghue@isoc.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Cc: jose@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at least on key indicator be mandatory
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:22:16 -0000

1A,  a key indicator SHOULD be included. (not a MUST)

On Apr 11, 2013, at 4:59 PM, Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org> wrote:

> Issue #15 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/15. suggests requiring that a key indicator, such as a “kid” field, be required in all JWS and JWE headers. Are use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than the JWS or JWE headers important?
> Which of these best describes your preferences on this issue?
> 
> 1.  Yes.
> 
> 2.   No.
> 
> 0.  I need more information to decide.
> 
>  
> 
> Your reply is requested by Friday, April 19th (or earlier). 
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> jose@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email