IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at least on key indicator be mandatory

Breno de Medeiros <breno@google.com> Mon, 15 April 2013 17:16 UTC

Return-Path: <breno@google.com>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A0221F9613 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 10:16:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TF1l32JCJXWV for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 10:16:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-f48.google.com (mail-oa0-f48.google.com [209.85.219.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5D421F9602 for <jose@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 10:16:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id j1so4644578oag.35 for <jose@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 10:16:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=5KBxHR8X9lMXXKE2SkutIr2nbivP4gtdehEbpPcqjAE=; b=T2Gze1BL+wplZEmOuYRIig0ExiAeHOkQgs3J0J83va1y+kqoM+PJ86Ck1tdyOltnc6 pkx1C3/9Is2nLYC3z0hta0aMBFDOg9HqxkzV4mERhGhcefVHezoE6NDdbPlQagUqjR+B w3fEy1nRUA0h6GHpk9cjcofDLBcyTxk4VG/9pmkeRtbQb76K7x5DM+imXM+RFXEUmRTE SrMv98vW/z2p5tb7axfW7nQy3mGL1FupkbLDV98LmRUteaH8zel1YxtHBW+7inMsLb+s dzQwu5+bO9liYwRouwFA7JjoHPHh+6s45Kerxv6vpXyg8i28+NPNbyU/iPMIISnCJXjF 2/Vw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=5KBxHR8X9lMXXKE2SkutIr2nbivP4gtdehEbpPcqjAE=; b=pOu0kIRdTHkecSFwEqUNfW2+Fu1KLAXmCwwJzNOtPsXYYIZxDc52n6zt358ZIITcIt luQkoTFjVc+8ub2Jd+phb6Ne9DDfMEm0TW9E5TMmJPLE8O0pY3uXJKNseFygxYk95ghH vA0oaqwpG27u6XGKur8j1to+tf6qf9tY3YHZr11OxA5l60MDEjf+HfszhLDPaazuhcmg dXiYjgrnX0AZhcxRASCNksMZK7UdtjHpEVW7o7033jJcQr7nZR6VJ/r9T9j5VYb7WJMn NBjGLkuO0L0F3Fc9KZt/EaAIrO08wd4Ui/NozJNIK0T3hMwB3wjTQbX2l26InXVcV9RH /3BA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.93.105 with SMTP id ct9mr7699307oeb.70.1366046165753; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 10:16:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.89.162 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 10:16:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAK+KdNXfZqvVbhSSQe87DNp7t1AMyUKq0LZ45xJuJDU1-bfLJQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <51674E63.3050809@isoc.org> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394367615F37@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <AB5C7306-21DE-40FA-BBC6-114BCD3DADFD@adm.umu.se> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394367641294@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <074f8f5e0dad44509e5fe16b3b9ad818@BY2PR03MB041.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CAK+KdNXfZqvVbhSSQe87DNp7t1AMyUKq0LZ45xJuJDU1-bfLJQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 10:16:05 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAJ++qEHUTt_EMiDbqmd8+zdFVuF1b8sAu8SDZ=BhX3YuO1ngA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Breno de Medeiros <breno@google.com>
To: Matias Woloski <matiasw@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkMF6UJ/7lRFBOdTnwZp4hKfVkduSQz8qFwo2h56k+PXSD/etEC6a43efBCGbLG5ZHNu2CGjr5ARC4YCsAzQHqBD9T2ZuXfYRpNOnSV/Ekc4OCUId56/pnZih22By//Wb0OIV5ooOprm07TxSEk9T5T9PaMT1N4G/JZPWkjptkuERpAsiacmF7QwudxMxnX5xKkG2OU
Cc: Anthony Nadalin <tonynad@microsoft.com>, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>, "odonoghue@isoc.org" <odonoghue@isoc.org>, "jose@ietf.org" <jose@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at least on key indicator be mandatory
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 17:16:07 -0000

1. Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than
the JWS and JWE headers ARE important

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Matias Woloski <matiasw@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1.  Yes - Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than
> the JWS and JWE headers ARE important.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Anthony Nadalin <tonynad@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> 1.  Yes - Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than
>> the JWS and JWE headers ARE important.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: jose-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:jose-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>> Mike Jones
>> Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 8:25 AM
>> To: odonoghue@isoc.org
>> Cc: jose@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at
>> least on key indicator be mandatory
>>
>> 1.  Yes - Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than
>> the JWS and JWE headers ARE important.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Roland Hedberg [mailto:roland.hedberg@adm.umu.se]
>> Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2013 1:33 AM
>> To: odonoghue@isoc.org
>> Cc: jose@ietf.org; Mike Jones
>> Subject: Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at
>> least on key indicator be mandatory
>>
>> I support 1 as defined by Mike.
>>
>> 12 apr 2013 kl. 07:25 skrev Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>:
>>
>> > 1.  Yes - Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other
>> > than the JWS and JWE headers ARE important
>>
>> -- Roland
>>
>> From: Mike Jones
>> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 10:25 PM
>> To: 'odonoghue@isoc.org'; jose@ietf.org
>> Subject: RE: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at
>> least on key indicator be mandatory
>>
>> Reading this question, I believe that there's a possibility for the
>> question to be misinterpreted, since the sense of the question in the
>> subject is opposite of the sense of the question in the body.  I believe
>> that the intent of 1 and 2 were as follows:
>>
>> 1.  Yes - Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than
>> the JWS and JWE headers ARE important.
>> 2.  No - Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than
>> the JWS and JWE headers ARE NOT important.
>>
>> Maybe people could reply with 1 and 2 as above, so that their answers to
>> the question of whether these use cases are important are not are
>> unambiguous.
>>
>>                                                             -- Mike
>>
>> From: jose-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:jose-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>> Karen O'Donoghue
>> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 5:00 PM
>> To: jose@ietf.org
>> Subject: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at
>> least on key indicator be mandatory
>>
>> Issue #15 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/15. suggests
>> requiring that a key indicator, such as a "kid" field, be required in all
>> JWS and JWE headers. Are use cases where key information is exchanged by
>> means other than the JWS or JWE headers important?
>> Which of these best describes your preferences on this issue?
>> 1.  Yes.
>> 2.   No.
>> 0.  I need more information to decide.
>>
>> Your reply is requested by Friday, April 19th (or earlier).
>> _______________________________________________
>> jose mailing list
>> jose@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jose mailing list
>> jose@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> jose@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
>



-- 
--Breno

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email