IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at least on key indicator be mandatory

hideki nara <hdknr@ic-tact.co.jp> Mon, 15 April 2013 07:02 UTC

Return-Path: <hdknr@ic-tact.co.jp>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E208821F92FC for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 00:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.622
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.622 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1WlTHg3qGS+p for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 00:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ia0-x22e.google.com (mail-ia0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c02::22e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F85221F92E9 for <jose@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 00:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ia0-f174.google.com with SMTP id o25so1229433iad.5 for <jose@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 00:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=ShvJG6J8blGtvuLB6x6xYPXkiwM4/K+WvKkoa14y0NI=; b=HSarosxjFa0gVRHfQmkxIacjWRO1ZJbZI7zhHmjfPdHx727/yKulf3wEiB/Zo1dQns Du5JtAIEI9fTXZA1+aHq+rTcF4bafMEIzpGlTH8Qlz9AEt0yuxSYLmEY7DKQHCGTDS0k hNuuQa17JmWJjbMHZXwGXiTIEFDYOANDBJVbojUN0HS5lS7Jb/jUqDHXLboyv81LseBX t4CWbcrP3fvV6Flxl9a29Fbu/xAELbd0CE6DyO2JX5zHLOwyvAcmO80fLZU22PgRkIUA tUjGGwVG3VA9kauBhNPgVIS020CW9WRGbi0cLAfXJ61SvoxVrNvryFpwZoEStrRCdsOs 6QgQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.112.100 with SMTP id ip4mr4695653igb.87.1366009330975; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 00:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.103.194 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 00:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <51674E63.3050809@isoc.org>
References: <51674E63.3050809@isoc.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:02:10 +0900
Message-ID: <CAAAkSUETvQFGiLH2TW=pawtgv-342_+wdGcqG0M7DU4=O6fjZw@mail.gmail.com>
From: hideki nara <hdknr@ic-tact.co.jp>
To: Karen ODonoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b3a9ad2eed82304da60d497"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk5PrCvU11Gu81O9RhyXT+N1N/ubOpNvMbH//MDpaKA81b9okaZpc+R37FgzvJuOdfsOS9d
Cc: "jose@ietf.org" <jose@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at least on key indicator be mandatory
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 07:02:12 -0000

1


2013/4/12 Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>

>  Issue #15 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/15. suggests
> requiring that a key indicator, such as a “kid” field, be required in all
> JWS and JWE headers.****** Are use cases where key information is
> exchanged by means other than the JWS or JWE headers important?**
>
> Which of these best describes your preferences on this issue?****
>
> 1.  Yes.****
>
> 2.   No. ****
>
> 0.  I need more information to decide.****
>
> ** **
> Your reply is requested by Friday, April 19th (or earlier).
>
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> jose@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email