IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?

hideki nara <hdknr@ic-tact.co.jp> Mon, 15 April 2013 07:01 UTC

Return-Path: <hdknr@ic-tact.co.jp>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFD7821F9305 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 00:01:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.622
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.622 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SB+kU8idTUcm for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 00:01:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ia0-x22d.google.com (mail-ia0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c02::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F2B921F92E9 for <jose@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 00:01:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ia0-f173.google.com with SMTP id j5so3535800iaf.32 for <jose@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 00:01:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=DM9kvvvtWmWVqvbKh7Twf0o+yJZkUUtoBC0DjI7FHK0=; b=jLCDRvZZU3e9m7HQBm9cgE4zKPE2Ly6mhSEG4WMZfAm5j5vWMvj8vio7LLqTAlK+wv wg3VZAA4P32mGlEYQKS8GR6pFPMaP+FrZzvj+GKY5A2xthmYJzWFHYVQ5ujrekKAukRh I519XOa06JaQg7QrxHxPbQvYwpCpyJOjr5DUqaNAeYevZlbIPjmcH6V2v2LzAIk0lmRL WZwlmEp1d7yyzed7mjGMVCCV+/DrYBYrgThcK/xPfKwY6ktlejsGlQ83ciufXykgdw2r 3rkYhAT/QAL7LLYT7qumt5AV8vD0FxqY/BRCqJy/Vj5UoWsCcN8dfSkIGBMVeTkFekMu uTug==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.7.3 with SMTP id f3mr4790337iga.50.1366009276741; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 00:01:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.103.194 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 00:01:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <51674E2D.3040604@isoc.org>
References: <51674E2D.3040604@isoc.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:01:16 +0900
Message-ID: <CAAAkSUHkLrdutjWo7mhmS2nm4sGf5f=h1wdhwiNBQ4GTFam6eg@mail.gmail.com>
From: hideki nara <hdknr@ic-tact.co.jp>
To: Karen ODonoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0122f7b0b34bdc04da60d13d"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnDPodsGLg4wLNNmDY/ennWEjNg2ecqx3Emfy+7LhQ6iTkP2TWlj9NNo/XDdR2+q2uQ4TCW
Cc: "jose@ietf.org" <jose@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 07:01:21 -0000

1


2013/4/12 Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>

>  ****Issue #8 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/8 proposes
> adding an “spi” (security parameters index) header parameter to the JWS and
> JWE specifications.  This modification to the JOSE formats would allow for
> signaling that pre-negotiated cryptographic parameters are being used,
> rather than including those parameters in the JWS or JWE header.  This
> proposal has been written up as
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-barnes-jose-spi-00.****
>
> ** **
>
> Which of these best describes your preferences on this issue?****
>
> 1.  Have draft-barnes-jose-spi remain a separate specification that could
> optionally also be supported by JWS and JWE implementations.****
>
> 2.  Incorporate draft-barnes-jose-spi into the JWS and JWE specifications
> as a mandatory feature.****
>
> 3.  Incorporate draft-barnes-jose-spi into the JWS and JWE specifications
> as an optional feature.****
>
> 4.  Another resolution (please specify in detail).****
>
> 0.  I need more information to decide.****
> Your reply is requested by Friday, April 19th or earlier.
>
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> jose@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email