IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?

"charles.marais@orange.com" <charles.marais@orange.com> Wed, 17 April 2013 12:41 UTC

Return-Path: <charles.marais@orange.com>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BF7621F8DC1 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 05:41:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.291
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.291 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_GIF_ATTACH=1.42, TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_NAME_LONG=1.08]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c0fphEe4kDOg for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 05:41:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from r-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (r-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com [217.108.152.41]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D9C521F8D8D for <jose@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 05:41:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from r-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 0FE1CDE57A7 for <jose@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:43:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.47]) by r-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0595ADE57AE for <jose@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:43:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.44]) by ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:41:48 +0200
Received: from [10.193.13.83] ([10.193.13.83]) by ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:41:47 +0200
Message-ID: <516E988B.2050304@orange.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:41:47 +0200
From: "charles.marais@orange.com" <charles.marais@orange.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: jose@ietf.org
References: <51674E2D.3040604@isoc.org>
In-Reply-To: <51674E2D.3040604@isoc.org>
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="------------050900030308060003050202"
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Apr 2013 12:41:47.0976 (UTC) FILETIME=[ED092480:01CE3B68]
Subject: Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:41:51 -0000

Hi,

1.  Have draft-barnes-jose-spi remain a separate specification that could optionally also be supported by JWS and JWE implementations.

Br,

Charles Marais.

Le 12/04/2013 01:58, Karen O'Donoghue a écrit :
Issue #8 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/8" rel="nofollow"> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/8 proposes adding an “spi” (security parameters index) header parameter to the JWS and JWE specifications.  This modification to the JOSE formats would allow for signaling that pre-negotiated cryptographic parameters are being used, rather than including those parameters in the JWS or JWE header.  This proposal has been written up as http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-barnes-jose-spi-00" rel="nofollow">http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-barnes-jose-spi-00.

 

Which of these best describes your preferences on this issue?

1.  Have draft-barnes-jose-spi remain a separate specification that could optionally also be supported by JWS and JWE implementations.

2.  Incorporate draft-barnes-jose-spi into the JWS and JWE specifications as a mandatory feature.

3.  Incorporate draft-barnes-jose-spi into the JWS and JWE specifications as an optional feature.

4.  Another resolution (please specify in detail).

0.  I need more information to decide.

Your reply is requested by Friday, April 19th or earlier. 


_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
jose@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose" rel="nofollow">https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose

--

MARAIS Charles
FT/OLNC/OLPS/ASE/IDEA/UED
Tel : 02.96.05.24.18
charles.marais@orange.com
WF004Bis / R&D Lannion / 2, avenue Pierre Marzin / 22307 LANNION Cedex - France



v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email