IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?

Matias Woloski <matiasw@gmail.com> Mon, 15 April 2013 16:37 UTC

Return-Path: <matiasw@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BE6C21F9600 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 09:37:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JhXefL2krcao for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 09:37:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ee0-f46.google.com (mail-ee0-f46.google.com [74.125.83.46]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E279321F9458 for <jose@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 09:37:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ee0-f46.google.com with SMTP id d49so2300538eek.5 for <jose@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 09:37:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=HwQGIjMWlHkM/t54AzKNL5PYxWoJqgm27mFG6Pm/jF4=; b=FDPG85CHzJuXTXtECiW3n35CzTPGpTA5yuiCPTVbJA7lVX82k7P9F9PpwoKTs0b68s 74z87eO/QJEXn/STFE4FSiqr5TfHiJ1xN4KSUCqziEVlHRSZlx6HO7J26ItsHiZgO1/i gqTBYXNETMrpX3x75zhBhcJms/GlmBfjHxPIx0JlLroqXqUXf9dyInw0JGBLO3wb36xm yLVNErlydXM7aRyw950jgGCH3RkDz+cKIKqkPMIv0t8cbXyDKdbsKBnMOigvPGBLJt9u KMl51OqlYq4X0CiBXZhOmOt8b5+qCDLtgfzSAwk82ivxH0tXOInXpOtsWwgNK31/zR+0 03Aw==
X-Received: by 10.14.87.199 with SMTP id y47mr40446976eee.17.1366043830881; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 09:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.15.33.198 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 09:36:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <72C48E43-190F-4CBA-8757-404FD9BBF774@gmail.com>
References: <51674E2D.3040604@isoc.org> <E4DAFDF1-0EAE-423A-ABA5-7D4A4B9462B9@adm.umu.se> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B1680429673943676410FC@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <72C48E43-190F-4CBA-8757-404FD9BBF774@gmail.com>
From: Matias Woloski <matiasw@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:36:49 -0300
Message-ID: <CAK+KdNWJdA0BaDtTTa15==UChT5Bc=FOLP0Cnc80ccLveUdK7w@mail.gmail.com>
To: nov matake <matake@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c29c6049b32304da68dd10"
Cc: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>, "odonoghue@isoc.org" <odonoghue@isoc.org>, "jose@ietf.org" <jose@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:37:13 -0000

1


On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 12:59 PM, nov matake <matake@gmail.com> wrote:

> 1
>
> nov
>
> On Apr 16, 2013, at 12:18 AM, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
>
> > 1.  Have draft-barnes-jose-spi remain a separate specification that
> could optionally also be supported by JWS and JWE implementations.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: jose-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:jose-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Roland Hedberg
> > Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2013 1:35 AM
> > To: odonoghue@isoc.org
> > Cc: jose@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we
> add a "spi" header field?
> >
> > 1
> >
> > 12 apr 2013 kl. 01:58 skrev Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>:
> >
> > Issue #8 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/8 proposes
> adding an "spi" (security parameters index) header parameter to the JWS and
> JWE specifications.  This modification to the JOSE formats would allow for
> signaling that pre-negotiated cryptographic parameters are being used,
> rather than including those parameters in the JWS or JWE header.  This
> proposal has been written up as
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-barnes-jose-spi-00.
> >
> >
> > Which of these best describes your preferences on this issue?
> >
> > 1.  Have draft-barnes-jose-spi remain a separate specification that
> could optionally also be supported by JWS and JWE implementations.
> >
> > 2.  Incorporate draft-barnes-jose-spi into the JWS and JWE
> specifications as a mandatory feature.
> >
> > 3.  Incorporate draft-barnes-jose-spi into the JWS and JWE
> specifications as an optional feature.
> >
> > 4.  Another resolution (please specify in detail).
> >
> > 0.  I need more information to decide.
> >
> > Your reply is requested by Friday, April 19th or earlier.
> > _______________________________________________
> > jose mailing list
> > jose@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > jose mailing list
> > jose@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
> > _______________________________________________
> > jose mailing list
> > jose@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> jose@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email