IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?

Edmund Jay <ejay@mgi1.com> Mon, 15 April 2013 18:04 UTC

Return-Path: <edmundjay@sbcglobal.net>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5143C21F9473 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 11:04:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.854
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.854 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.744, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KF+rHJapb9aZ for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 11:04:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nm24-vm0.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com (nm24-vm0.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.94.236.143]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D55C21F9457 for <jose@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 11:04:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [66.94.237.192] by nm24.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Apr 2013 18:04:28 -0000
Received: from [66.94.237.111] by tm3.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Apr 2013 18:04:28 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1016.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Apr 2013 18:04:28 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 120855.5016.bm@omp1016.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 42762 invoked by uid 60001); 15 Apr 2013 18:04:27 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sbcglobal.net; s=s1024; t=1366049067; bh=t9vOQsSTectDYbuZMuWslr9PVw19nrb/Iuz1o3CdMCc=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=PhbBPWzz5khf7EUw3xW0WPPw0mmAi6ehd4voAvupQc25ksYGQlVXlug9opPVC7vIUgBYIG9Q/GAyBlnTlqqZDqxZZSMfWHTkYFEdoasZc0xT46iznw9TZJnp1YXJld+SoblKt+m+4ULLcJDC9hempQIMLlBwwNUU/oxMdehu4Yc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=i6mN6WD5RAthq+j0pIT5ZMJTwYetRRHtXR76nC6lJts8Fn4HgKiX7BD5fWetKduhUIvx270rObSDKTKDp/jd2hKc51A4tBnjtC8NN0u5xXqVWj7WD1pyVqXeZEamCBNqJIFwNfPUcjcTy/UwvkKB0g5VgG9VladfFqwYBvMgY74=;
X-YMail-OSG: 4CG5R7kVM1nnZKVChV11oXMH0.tR25MhsNTUwaO83NBXcoY JKax1Ri44_Iaf67_aPFKW9WgRrrnIc_WAv_uDy.L9OV9qjW_dJzbvs1c8.hz G2392MSZis1rXX4kOF2a8Q2ni8FB9SHy27ptSI_QmERt07XspRiw64oFI6Rs mEuGD1HGP7nqw6QsRHDsIqGOjNpAgjN2VBHCJJkVk3EM2UrUdebqX2l8WCWV osGTKJjDrt2uFM4jKidj2DtpWq85jima3cIPtCZ661yYANXyUHUi1Pd5y_ns epjy6O0_BHq3yJRldf1oXNtakICEHIcpJCR0GQrf_8YPE68any0Syr2QVVGr sCtHZDd8PhHeetRbiN9csH19LMuOiH03kkAPbmdqHaec19JHL_PDnlbL_FqY 6boUKETangrodeZkHx2w3fEBHvRnl3ERMajyypPAKZaNWHtN3b_B7w08KxLq .gMT20jcGLh5Dlqtf7dAClQBWKWOg.YespceuDpgozagE4xBry31V3vkgpG_ e8_lKejPX2VA-
Received: from [70.36.254.42] by web184401.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 11:04:27 PDT
X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001, MQoKCgoKX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KRnJvbTogS2FyZW4gTydEb25vZ2h1ZSA8b2Rvbm9naHVlQGlzb2Mub3JnPgpUbzogam9zZUBpZXRmLm9yZwpTZW50OiBUaHUsIEFwcmlsIDExLCAyMDEzIDQ6NTg6NDUgUE0KU3ViamVjdDogW2pvc2VdIEZlZWRiYWNrIHJlcXVlc3Qgb24gam9zZSB0cmFja2VyIGlzc3VlICM4OiBTaG91bGQgd2UgYWRkIGEgInNwaSIgCmhlYWRlciBmaWVsZD8KCklzc3VlICM4IGh0dHA6Ly90cmFjLnRvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnL3dnL2pvc2UvdHJhYy90aWNrZXQBMAEBAQE-
X-RocketYMMF: edmundjay@sbcglobal.net
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/728 YahooMailWebService/0.8.140.532
References: <51674E2D.3040604@isoc.org>
Message-ID: <1366049067.38201.YahooMailRC@web184401.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 11:04:27 -0700
From: Edmund Jay <ejay@mgi1.com>
To: odonoghue@isoc.org, jose@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <51674E2D.3040604@isoc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1009959307-156234040-1366049067=:38201"
Subject: Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 18:04:29 -0000

1




________________________________
From: Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>
To: jose@ietf.org
Sent: Thu, April 11, 2013 4:58:45 PM
Subject: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" 
header field?

Issue #8 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/8 proposes     adding an 
“spi” (security parameters index) header parameter to the     JWS and JWE 
specifications.  This modification to the JOSE formats     would allow for 
signaling that pre-negotiated cryptographic     parameters are being used, 
rather than including those parameters in     the JWS or JWE header.  This 
proposal has been written up as 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-barnes-jose-spi-00. 

 
Which of these best         describes your preferences on this issue?
1.  Have         draft-barnes-jose-spi remain a separate specification that 
could         optionally also be supported by JWS and JWE implementations.
2.  Incorporate draft-barnes-jose-spi         into the JWS and JWE 
specifications as a mandatory feature.
3.  Incorporate         draft-barnes-jose-spi into the JWS and JWE 
specifications as an         optional feature.
4.  Another         resolution (please specify in detail).
0.  I need more         information to decide.Your reply is requested by Friday, 
April       19th or earlier.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email