IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at least on key indicator be mandatory

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Mon, 15 April 2013 15:34 UTC

Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 164B621F93D8 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 08:34:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.275
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.275 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.850, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tRo2ba5QirLW for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 08:34:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x22b.google.com (mail-ob0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ADEA21F93C6 for <jose@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 08:34:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f171.google.com with SMTP id wc20so1199302obb.16 for <jose@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 08:34:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=xlvGasAf/vnbwx0dL8bZAprLZmgiHqjAhr6JnEZMlVs=; b=DDhIzYZRroJGhmlFXL3aQLhmyg1VCShhDlbZt2Dj4VZoZZBeyZ1+9L18GBmt5Gj7vG mZ/1AFCVca5lJ8NTHJYh8vOYaxO8uYzqRhwJfttLS4l72VQ/FDG3qP8kyjFNWkyjJ4CY xWjzbcx27bkab1IE0kSlk9EVSyIRXWE/2/crio1qozaAowXupkCTZjL5G1opudXysjua s6mqKeFGgDE88Cc2mr8G9vx8zk0iTuOTfUqxGFQZVckxUtjq3uKtJEmhzzcbBC96+el2 h8fw1rxSxKPJjbIgMQ7Uh/jH5a81cjQerhUYq2JkXEXKQZBJJYMU/pbfts/S+yHllzQe la6Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.27.40 with SMTP id q8mr7804382obg.100.1366040071739; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 08:34:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.60.25.196 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 08:34:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [66.207.95.33]
In-Reply-To: <EBAC9CD9-9A03-47D3-95AF-492E28C3AA56@gmail.com>
References: <51674E63.3050809@isoc.org> <EBAC9CD9-9A03-47D3-95AF-492E28C3AA56@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 11:34:31 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL02cgQozBCp52VWn9KG1NAJO7dCSVYP2gTvTY+uWmSvjTj5rA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
To: Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0122976239acef04da67fd3e"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlCXg66Zi4gesX9vGwd29yThoL4wUgkkgGWy828TnbsACZaUNwGEx8sTNZ2Y1NZzjvwnfIN
Cc: jose@ietf.org, odonoghue@isoc.org
Subject: Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at least on key indicator be mandatory
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 15:34:33 -0000

If including a key indicator is not a MUST, then you have to specify what
the receiver does when a key indicator is not present.  Could you suggest
text for that?

Thanks,
--Richard



On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com> wrote:

> 1A,  a key indicator SHOULD be included. (not a MUST)
>
> On Apr 11, 2013, at 4:59 PM, Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org> wrote:
>
>  Issue #15 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/15. suggests
> requiring that a key indicator, such as a “kid” field, be required in all
> JWS and JWE headers.**** Are use cases where key information is exchanged
> by means other than the JWS or JWE headers important?
>
> Which of these best describes your preferences on this issue?****
>
> 1.  Yes.****
>
> 2.   No. ****
>
> 0.  I need more information to decide.****
>
>
> Your reply is requested by Friday, April 19th (or earlier).
>  _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> jose@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> jose@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email