IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at least on key indicator be mandatory

nov matake <matake@gmail.com> Mon, 15 April 2013 16:03 UTC

Return-Path: <matake@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B9721F93C8 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 09:03:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.172
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.172 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.031, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QntSbqMDEdcp for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 09:03:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-f41.google.com (mail-pb0-f41.google.com [209.85.160.41]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6900521F958B for <jose@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 09:03:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pb0-f41.google.com with SMTP id mc17so2614462pbc.28 for <jose@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 09:03:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date :to; bh=dAxdHOJalXSAp99aLyUBD/5TmA/4TpvAHdIgFVAuxaE=; b=nvzadSaOA0ZOuj73svetGf86uiVdpYHK/3yho+CFsDOQ4YgbvkpSHldeZARHSDHOJH I/QHiLRtsL+/vMohaoaM3g+WxQ9MH5Un5MDCOp+zs17di6GiMUwR9lIERSMHsNe5OH7U +r5jRv0QtS1O1S2ZblOXYWmjGVc6jshZ2YUDo9E/eWUhywto11SawlYtsWxCCCnghqpP 0FE07ozLFTCr2TBOWp88hknYAXJkN/9JuDbWlcn1uXaM8HV+e+AZhUoL3g/I7eGetnf6 tckEzMzEdBL+kmJxFLBRoCfOkwX4wruitqqAYIMOtZxuBjHMgXzKqqRAWdvBOMjc/TEp h5Ng==
X-Received: by 10.69.0.226 with SMTP id bb2mr11982555pbd.34.1366041825202; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 09:03:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.33] (s146003.dynamic.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp. [220.157.146.3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n6sm5932053pbn.6.2013.04.15.09.03.42 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Apr 2013 09:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
References: <51674E63.3050809@isoc.org> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394367615F37@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <AB5C7306-21DE-40FA-BBC6-114BCD3DADFD@adm.umu.se> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394367641294@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394367641294@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B4273612-3669-46C7-8446-3DC6D2D1F354@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B329)
From: nov matake <matake@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 01:03:39 +0900
To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
Cc: "jose@ietf.org" <jose@ietf.org>, "odonoghue@isoc.org" <odonoghue@isoc.org>
Subject: Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at least on key indicator be mandatory
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:03:49 -0000

1

nov

On Apr 16, 2013, at 12:24 AM, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> wrote:

> 1.  Yes - Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than the JWS and JWE headers ARE important.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roland Hedberg [mailto:roland.hedberg@adm.umu.se] 
> Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2013 1:33 AM
> To: odonoghue@isoc.org
> Cc: jose@ietf.org; Mike Jones
> Subject: Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at least on key indicator be mandatory
> 
> I support 1 as defined by Mike.
> 
> 12 apr 2013 kl. 07:25 skrev Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>:
> 
>> 1.  Yes - Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than the JWS and JWE headers ARE important
> 
> -- Roland
> 
> From: Mike Jones 
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 10:25 PM
> To: 'odonoghue@isoc.org'; jose@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at least on key indicator be mandatory
> 
> Reading this question, I believe that there's a possibility for the question to be misinterpreted, since the sense of the question in the subject is opposite of the sense of the question in the body.  I believe that the intent of 1 and 2 were as follows:
> 
> 1.  Yes - Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than the JWS and JWE headers ARE important.
> 2.  No - Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than the JWS and JWE headers ARE NOT important.
> 
> Maybe people could reply with 1 and 2 as above, so that their answers to the question of whether these use cases are important are not are unambiguous.
> 
>                                                            -- Mike
> 
> From: jose-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:jose-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Karen O'Donoghue
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 5:00 PM
> To: jose@ietf.org
> Subject: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at least on key indicator be mandatory
> 
> Issue #15 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/15. suggests requiring that a key indicator, such as a "kid" field, be required in all JWS and JWE headers. Are use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than the JWS or JWE headers important? 
> Which of these best describes your preferences on this issue?
> 1.  Yes.
> 2.   No. 
> 0.  I need more information to decide.
> 
> Your reply is requested by Friday, April 19th (or earlier).
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> jose@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email