Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at least on key indicator be mandatory
"charles.marais@orange.com" <charles.marais@orange.com> Wed, 17 April 2013 12:38 UTC
Return-Path: <charles.marais@orange.com>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E54A921F8D8D for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 05:38:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.73
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.73 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.561, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_GIF_ATTACH=1.42, TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_NAME_LONG=1.08]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B+21FiEplolq for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 05:38:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p-mail1.rd.orange.com (p-mail1.rd.orange.com [195.101.245.15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B332721F8DC1 for <jose@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 05:38:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p-mail1.rd.orange.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id D8F7BFC48CB for <jose@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:38:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.47]) by p-mail1.rd.orange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B9EFC48C9 for <jose@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:38:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.44]) by ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:38:54 +0200
Received: from [10.193.13.83] ([10.193.13.83]) by ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:38:54 +0200
Message-ID: <516E97DE.3050507@orange.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:38:54 +0200
From: "charles.marais@orange.com" <charles.marais@orange.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: jose@ietf.org
References: <51674E63.3050809@isoc.org>
In-Reply-To: <51674E63.3050809@isoc.org>
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="------------000905070101010301090109"
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Apr 2013 12:38:54.0780 (UTC) FILETIME=[85CD87C0:01CE3B68]
Subject: Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at least on key indicator be mandatory
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:38:57 -0000
Charles Marais.
Issue #15 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/15" rel="nofollow"> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/15. suggests requiring that a key indicator, such as a “kid” field, be required in all JWS and JWE headers. Are use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than the JWS or JWE headers important?Which of these best describes your preferences on this issue?
1. Yes.
2. No.
0. I need more information to decide.
Your reply is requested by Friday, April 19th (or earlier).
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list jose@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose" rel="nofollow">https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
MARAIS Charles
FT/OLNC/OLPS/ASE/IDEA/UED
Tel : 02.96.05.24.18
charles.marais@orange.com
WF004Bis / R&D Lannion / 2, avenue Pierre Marzin / 22307 LANNION Cedex - France
- [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15… Karen O'Donoghue
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Dick Hardt
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Manger, James H
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Mike Jones
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Axel.Nennker
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Roland Hedberg
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… hideki nara
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Mike Jones
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Richard Barnes
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Richard Barnes
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Mike Jones
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… nov matake
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Anthony Nadalin
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Matias Woloski
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Breno de Medeiros
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Richard Barnes
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Mike Jones
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Edmund Jay
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Richard Barnes
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… charles.marais@orange.com
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Sascha Preibisch
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… John Bradley
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Javier Rojas Blum
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Vladimir Dzhuvinov / NimbusDS
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Matt Miller
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Nat Sakimura
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Russ Housley
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Richard Barnes
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Salvatore D'Agostino