Re: [Json] Pete Resnick's Yes on charter-ietf-json-00-01: (with COMMENT)

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Thu, 30 May 2013 14:06 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44F7321F85B8; Thu, 30 May 2013 07:06:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JlOK8NOY8Z0o; Thu, 30 May 2013 07:06:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1170E21F8E9A; Thu, 30 May 2013 07:05:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-1-98-173.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.98.173]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r4UE5LFB060583 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 30 May 2013 07:05:21 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <51A6FB37.80801@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 07:05:21 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1FE64995-D319-40D0-9994-AF0E1FEACFD8@vpnc.org>
References: <20130530045440.13528.48061.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <51A6FB37.80801@cisco.com>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, json@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Json] Pete Resnick's Yes on charter-ietf-json-00-01: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion related to JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\)." <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 14:06:02 -0000

On May 30, 2013, at 12:09 AM, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote:

> Pete,
> 
> As we are doing a dance with another standards organization, and as this
> is a functioning piece of work used throughout the Internet, I would be
> very careful about accepting other changes, and I would suggest that the
> bar be set high.  In this respect, I'd encourage the removal of the
> ambiguity.

I do not share Pete's concern, given that it is impossible to define "minimal" without looking at any proposed changes. However, since others do, a possible last-minute change to get rid of "goal" would be:

Current:
   The initial goal of this work is ...
Proposed:
   The initial work is ...

--Paul Hoffman