IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] Pete Resnick's Yes on charter-ietf-json-00-01: (with COMMENT)

"Matt Miller (mamille2)" <mamille2@cisco.com> Thu, 30 May 2013 15:57 UTC

Return-Path: <mamille2@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19CE221F9509; Thu, 30 May 2013 08:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.724
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.724 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.875, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xj4abNrJ9lTJ; Thu, 30 May 2013 08:57:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4019321F946F; Thu, 30 May 2013 08:57:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7288; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1369929447; x=1371139047; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=uYKgY+96noolajD/3hbeydRW5MJDbZJxoK1JiXMuFTc=; b=mWNh3EySLjeH9coaZ0KnHPTf1fdJ0n3bKeCGnoPqn8FARUHL8K9EwIHP JEyskZkhHsbeB84fmg+QaOL5DqjwmrrBrbnczhWP9soCz7loeB4wR2bDx kMJNLejocbjvtOqf540zBTaEUs44cxQIVq6oZhxH9n9Wy8AM69vSJNZ2L 8=;
X-Files: smime.p7s : 4136
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.87,770,1363132800"; d="p7s'?scan'208"; a="216794396"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 May 2013 15:57:24 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com [173.37.183.75]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r4UFvOp7028062 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 30 May 2013 15:57:24 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x11.cisco.com ([169.254.6.57]) by xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([173.37.183.75]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 30 May 2013 10:57:23 -0500
From: "Matt Miller (mamille2)" <mamille2@cisco.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Thread-Topic: [Json] Pete Resnick's Yes on charter-ietf-json-00-01: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHOXQSzt8ljQ4SStk+edwd/VujBSZkeFzmAgAAfTAA=
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 15:57:23 +0000
Message-ID: <BF7E36B9C495A6468E8EC573603ED94115258AB3@xmb-aln-x11.cisco.com>
References: <20130530045440.13528.48061.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <51A6FB37.80801@cisco.com> <1FE64995-D319-40D0-9994-AF0E1FEACFD8@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <1FE64995-D319-40D0-9994-AF0E1FEACFD8@vpnc.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.129.24.59]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2B9B8A3B-3872-4E02-9F81-29D12FA92026"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, "<json@ietf.org>" <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Pete Resnick's Yes on charter-ietf-json-00-01: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion related to JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\)." <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 15:58:09 -0000

On May 30, 2013, at 8:05 AM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:

> On May 30, 2013, at 12:09 AM, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
>> Pete,
>> 
>> As we are doing a dance with another standards organization, and as this
>> is a functioning piece of work used throughout the Internet, I would be
>> very careful about accepting other changes, and I would suggest that the
>> bar be set high.  In this respect, I'd encourage the removal of the
>> ambiguity.
> 
> I do not share Pete's concern, given that it is impossible to define "minimal" without looking at any proposed changes. However, since others do, a possible last-minute change to get rid of "goal" would be:
> 
> Current:
>   The initial goal of this work is ...
> Proposed:
>   The initial work is ...


Personally, I was ok with the original language; the succeeding paragraph, I thought, made it clear the WG would approach change with a tremendous amount of caution and set the level of effort to ratify those changes accordingly.

However, this phrasing works for me if it alleviates the concerns of others.


- m&m

Matt Miller < mamille2@cisco.com >
Cisco Systems, Inc.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email