IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Jsonpath] JSONPath draft charter

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Sun, 13 September 2020 03:40 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5163C3A0A43 for <jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 20:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tSnIGvJReKYc for <jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 20:40:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe31.google.com (mail-vs1-xe31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C50C83A0AAB for <jsonpath@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 20:40:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe31.google.com with SMTP id a16so7616466vsp.12 for <jsonpath@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 20:40:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ZRz1tCnjZaIq0jLzNUJ0lzKdQoQVt+6nWz7kqHvYYN4=; b=eyczBXvIKRlwIJecRyvxTQKRB+t0yFsJOptRaNfo48g0PGelqu5YNj24Jro8EEHOXs f1QkgYhnj+t+I8/dUpUiEj3uUieZ8/IdREleo0DsAjv1DOAaoAmuOveoJ9+VGjTCGhUM scBN0xpYj/gnwUL0au1MQfnGW49vk3OtamQ1QCtsracN3HZLotIcR8B3WJuQYocMeKc2 Drz6gZaT0YLsfyvaYXfKl9tyP8ATRiysJ15gfwmK6pJfFiPthcj9hpcWNOzau0Sn/0n4 rPma3x0mg+oA76yAbR3LnMnJQeCLnsUvBgS2zKSVY9qjzqletO1rJlHySKr72EraTrLt vGrg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZRz1tCnjZaIq0jLzNUJ0lzKdQoQVt+6nWz7kqHvYYN4=; b=TiHswbTTMWbR9U8rItXm+SOLaHfddi3zUHcIo8MPs1RDHIvF6PgeWD51a/gKLXfhrE miArLH8hxMN/gGpS9DHelPC0k0ut8PbyiBmlQl65qMDQh4ZyGss3grckRjYGvtE2uAyJ dFVLBXLW6XZPRIAQ3thRdW89Wo8YJACYm/QrK++c9YGFiCp9R9jjLMKJwL5N3eKPBRFJ a9wvxy0L8ehVUOBbdE1ZDSNsHXvr8dhyoaO7pLjKg3+FGMC9RBIRXkr+x7zUVDsvOTjv m0bZdIvDSheHNXN9RFtwmSkgMnwuRHtZlqdbJmPm4p3Pika7gDyEc8cw/QUuav2s+Mco GoBg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532IfPJUvAmHXimOu83gWLzisSc/ocj2GLZUCcn0UqHRIeQQAIH7 udv4fMwrZNAYSLvfPm3pbGo9yzRZnFXNcXuZL6g=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz8E3kIs1TDfWFR8jDMRx8cuTTmjKDJ++vT8ORVCB+X72VM97Nyzxl4L/dmct2gbXP9CCkVj8ohHNLRBcBJFhM=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:f511:: with SMTP id u17mr4704106vsn.2.1599968399621; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 20:39:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <mailman.38.1597172408.10748.jsonpath@ietf.org> <CA+mwktKSMn0e3Xh5K3z-wxeC_icx3dnepWvxKu74miGqLb_wxA@mail.gmail.com> <AEE0C02D-DF63-4CEF-AC78-08180BC0B0F2@tzi.org> <CAHBU6ivxaeKRm8+5_DiP=qtpiWXEffD374n6dxx4bgJTt1nCbw@mail.gmail.com> <22C87C6B-F7FB-4074-8EEF-118AA28AB61B@tzi.org> <3AC3C075-2CA3-4DDC-BEE8-C3C4B179A61B@vmware.com> <CAHBU6ivA79KFJa4DfO4BEdGJ1K9pWP+cgHC4tegNjW90favxAw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwb4WtQEKcnPmPYhkXp4_0rYjJKC52SEVtuxiG3MCVtXjQ@mail.gmail.com> <2498CFE1-D301-4238-AD9E-926817C4D7E5@tzi.org> <F868B402-52BE-4E79-84D8-13C000F0942F@vmware.com> <B91DEC0E-FE52-48DE-88BD-DD7C2109DD5A@tzi.org> <193BACC1-9D5F-4987-BA4E-3AFF9632D995@vmware.com> <9ACF3893-A7F1-4DD3-910C-92362BA652A5@tzi.org> <99DAB3E2-4359-47B5-98C7-25D1BC2B7E55@vmware.com> <CAHBU6itre+NLgxjdbK3WAdj9VvCrvbj0CqXbvMr1ZaeuSpdncw@mail.gmail.com> <B7AE60B2-1904-4F9B-AE4F-FD1BF034E884@tzi.org> <CAL0qLwbVL7MDQqafLR4+CQo+eeLEt0WKrwu1RijSU5r5QNHqcw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHBU6itZD7orcMeTk8SuUF5QzQ0eb5eBctv9q_5AyWKRFoi7-g@mail.gmail.com> <FE3BE846-D0B8-455F-801E-1EA943598C3A@tzi.org> <CAHBU6itUjC6yhGTn+RWQjA--g3yBq8mFHzoTs6BAkg9pDaY34g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHBU6itUjC6yhGTn+RWQjA--g3yBq8mFHzoTs6BAkg9pDaY34g@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 20:39:47 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwaOGLu2BpsQuRN4WXznP__vR=Rcp_v3S095025v5tK6EA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Cc: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, "jsonpath@ietf.org" <jsonpath@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001c857105af29acab"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jsonpath/aSU3XAVlaVdN0oGKdHNFOYLYkDw>
Subject: Re: [Jsonpath] JSONPath draft charter
X-BeenThere: jsonpath@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A summary description of the list to be included in the table on this page <jsonpath.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jsonpath>, <mailto:jsonpath-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jsonpath/>
List-Post: <mailto:jsonpath@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jsonpath-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonpath>, <mailto:jsonpath-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2020 03:40:02 -0000

Works for me too. Going back to DISPATCH with this is the next step,
correct?

If so, fire when ready.

-MSK

On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 1:17 PM Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> wrote:

> Works for me.
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 1:08 PM Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
>
>> On 2020-09-02, at 19:54, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > I made https://github.com/jsonpath-wg/charter/pull/2 to say changes to
>> JMESPath and JSON Pointer are not contemplated. I actually don't have much
>> of an opinion as to whether this is an improvement, so I'm OK either way.
>>
>> I think the IESG usually wants much stronger language than “not
>> contemplated” for the charter exclusions.  For me, that is already implicit
>> in the statement of what it does do, so this language might even be a step
>> backwards.
>>
>> I would simply say “These are out of scope for the WG” at the end of the
>> penultimate paragraph, but that may not be entirely true either:
>> We may want to describe the two-way mapping between JSON Pointer and
>> JSONPath for a subset (or an important part of that subset) where that
>> two-way mapping exists.
>>
>> So that would make it:
>>
>> > These approaches are out of scope for the WG, except that it may be
>> > useful to describe the mapping between subsets of JSON Pointer and
>> > JSONPath.
>>
>> (If that turns out to be a bad restriction, we can always ask for a
>> recharter later, so there is no need for weaselwords.)
>>
>> Now https://github.com/jsonpath-wg/charter/pull/3
>>
>> Grüße, Carsten
>>
>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email