IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Jsonpath] Jsonpath Digest, Vol 2, Issue 1

Daniel P <danielaparker@gmail.com> Tue, 11 August 2020 19:56 UTC

Return-Path: <danielaparker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A1DE3A0C29 for <jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 12:56:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j6TBBSmt25rC for <jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 12:56:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42d.google.com (mail-wr1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B58B3A0C18 for <jsonpath@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 12:56:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id l2so12598396wrc.7 for <jsonpath@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 12:56:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=JFJGTfrWGWQ7EYZyHE18rRQmmST2EoeBPPScv3X0qlg=; b=et7MGuN3iZ48fl0NAgWPT9jmG9d5EyuZh8bEeDYL391nvY8mKcczX7agKQPmCHlEmY ugTMAWlB9l/OQ+OnNTHlPUtDcwXpe1Lqicsb0VQG/Sry0MENz1vYimvoYy77EpaiCuYJ 1ylkjjyasT9DZgoOlpGJi+lOSwj8T8yvuoXBw+WRCGdOZNVUEwAqLlLugHq3T2ze8zOw w8LZoGbLQbi2nostwAKCEXL195UGrKozuRByFdZRfVXUq6PDavz5djY/V8EbdSSU/AyB 19tArnHhrPs6c7d3tdFjqs1lAQHeEuyDAux76AC3z91tyONiFnG0q9XBQN4tOQ+CX+M6 60PA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=JFJGTfrWGWQ7EYZyHE18rRQmmST2EoeBPPScv3X0qlg=; b=UJkGGMQCCz/PI5LRpUM2wIaDECPzDo/Z6oi4iKATWxp4uA53N0GWRV+y6XmdHyk+X+ tBJcgbuYbUAtoWGz7zjQktb4uBjEmvUdgVqJqIMbiHgtV1/fUTeHMEWzfOEjYzhadZzI ++0+BamDF6GhVaC5ArfVKdWF6VYO2+bVh0ByDkv/an2F+uaUSp/AbO1lYXCEfjyPy/2C Ek0uTv8m0E9BPf6J/jl+WKxBCm7kDWdcqUWCj9C6UW0XV015KjTaYqbzEcEy5pY9kHEs PtXfO0+Xlh2MPD4ePkUQk87ExCW1vYPua9wHkvRCzu+fCfd3UWabU3oqE7IEYRItLs9z awYw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530eSiHRHYa4UdO9XRXn9fx19ZLIwqo/OWfsMSdn/uSUo8VYrHz7 V74ZipB+0NsdT5+fJ97wNhgfBtvWWnNMFLLFYHPZVdGB4N8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwFe2dH6QN4yMaQyNiBsMko2hGC2P1QMqH3cXn4P8IiQ7SPiUcCETqtZ482TuZuhlXt5S7Z0P5AnvClwFOf6g0=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:9ed4:: with SMTP id b20mr30681784wrf.206.1597175772598; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 12:56:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <mailman.38.1597172408.10748.jsonpath@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <mailman.38.1597172408.10748.jsonpath@ietf.org>
From: Daniel P <danielaparker@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 15:56:00 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+mwktKSMn0e3Xh5K3z-wxeC_icx3dnepWvxKu74miGqLb_wxA@mail.gmail.com>
To: jsonpath@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jsonpath/1Lv5spXw-6GEk1DBBi8Gwmu1wCw>
Subject: Re: [Jsonpath] Jsonpath Digest, Vol 2, Issue 1
X-BeenThere: jsonpath@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A summary description of the list to be included in the table on this page <jsonpath.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jsonpath>, <mailto:jsonpath-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jsonpath/>
List-Post: <mailto:jsonpath@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jsonpath-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonpath>, <mailto:jsonpath-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 19:56:18 -0000

> From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
> To: Stefan Hagen <stefan@dilettant.eu>
> Cc: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Davide Bettio <davide.bettio@ispirata.com>, jsonpath@ietf.org
> Bcc:
> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:45:23 -0700
> Subject: Re: [Jsonpath] JSONPath or JMESPath
> Sounds like JMESPath is already reasonably well-defined. JSONPath isn't. JSONPath is widely adopted
> and in my most recent job, lack of a standardized definition was a real problem. So it sounds to me like
> there's more value for the IETF to add with JSONPath.
>
Note that there is an emerging ISO SQL/JSON standard for JSONPath that
appears to have
the backing of Google, Amazon, Microsoft and Oracle, cf.
https://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/c067367_ISO_IEC_TR_19075-6_2017.zip

It seems to me that a separate standardization effort would need to
take this work into account and be
compatible with it, to have broad acceptance.

Daniel

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email