IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Jsonpath] JSONPath draft charter

Davide Bettio <davide.bettio@ispirata.com> Wed, 02 September 2020 15:48 UTC

Return-Path: <davide.bettio@ispirata.com>
X-Original-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B479D3A1214 for <jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 08:48:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ispirata.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DSHPoWjslu5q for <jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 08:48:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32e.google.com (mail-wm1-x32e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DC303A1211 for <jsonpath@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 08:48:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id z9so5062168wmk.1 for <jsonpath@ietf.org>; Wed, 02 Sep 2020 08:48:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ispirata.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WW7AX7SJ/p/cCzme71NWlKIenzxIviZdLZhNU7h8yho=; b=c+x/n62NCCDF2t8aI4gIiitmZS6xnqUcAkz50HMM+P8JEWCETpXPcks6T40jZZm/sh zfrrwpn4QGoZP3aZzuYS2XLBe8iBjXUgA2/og/Wo7YWVDD5Q20/IoocmeCxX15iGgxlH XbFPv6d4Yi1bsVTntqzb0K3WPs7dKiTErBRSiMSQ1jvsVMADOUZuwt45m+vfH+50m97H znzxHkpUweGvkKp6MtgXLrqLuAcHRutoHVuvvRkZUuRQUuMAzHxRdJ3JYmco0TY7HcSm grjQWuEQLvE3TyWRyd3alwGBWmOmhHgwcECDTX69QiKg+zS1E4eMh0IdIgytoAlxgmlZ 2vuA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WW7AX7SJ/p/cCzme71NWlKIenzxIviZdLZhNU7h8yho=; b=KoIITha0vhXvBqOIgbe5FLtDU3RoZJo5ljvMUXKCWBzU7kF7DS8RwU1gVNs/uMkYdQ zeHtZEBM1PvAusI8RLiU3ZsocAbB33ecYk7XerAQ1X9Oz4pp++njEC/+Sa24rKKe8p6J G39awgySXVtVMTTmbMBpCKFK5lcKrf4NDF+VDZQvvEFiUJfZT8x2hQH3jsIGBheCoTzK DNtX9An3EZqAnij1g4J8J73MP9ApvNbL4H+egZeN+OIvUM6/BhHL718eY2AyEOj95YAt UGhscMA49utAEBaM4XVrctiXyU8HQ0OEKQvAgtb7LjOEtRiQhURzIvi9bF8LwMqBKDRp 8bAw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5331c2fLkvNOnelvZw1A/+7hzE8eEDUlKpnIZKsbdZXtcYKiQjIr bPqyJlQB7WsrEnrZV8LSxQwviZp79qDmUN/gj4NbNw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzG0K72ic/TGIQji4kAIbC3a9vYo4+G8VMRAA4Ora0JpiWLMFsf/sQS8SSNkmZieQ0JmbF2jY99jXnUM+7Dp94=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2054:: with SMTP id p20mr1232683wmg.173.1599061736388; Wed, 02 Sep 2020 08:48:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <mailman.38.1597172408.10748.jsonpath@ietf.org> <CA+mwktKSMn0e3Xh5K3z-wxeC_icx3dnepWvxKu74miGqLb_wxA@mail.gmail.com> <AEE0C02D-DF63-4CEF-AC78-08180BC0B0F2@tzi.org> <CAHBU6ivxaeKRm8+5_DiP=qtpiWXEffD374n6dxx4bgJTt1nCbw@mail.gmail.com> <22C87C6B-F7FB-4074-8EEF-118AA28AB61B@tzi.org> <3AC3C075-2CA3-4DDC-BEE8-C3C4B179A61B@vmware.com> <CAHBU6ivA79KFJa4DfO4BEdGJ1K9pWP+cgHC4tegNjW90favxAw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwb4WtQEKcnPmPYhkXp4_0rYjJKC52SEVtuxiG3MCVtXjQ@mail.gmail.com> <2498CFE1-D301-4238-AD9E-926817C4D7E5@tzi.org> <F868B402-52BE-4E79-84D8-13C000F0942F@vmware.com> <B91DEC0E-FE52-48DE-88BD-DD7C2109DD5A@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <B91DEC0E-FE52-48DE-88BD-DD7C2109DD5A@tzi.org>
From: Davide Bettio <davide.bettio@ispirata.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 17:48:20 +0200
Message-ID: <CAAWU5L5vk6BUQB1xkV-x7Q7Sp4VdqawVUOTDYwMd2T23pQVpDA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: Glyn Normington <normingtong@vmware.com>, "jsonpath@ietf.org" <jsonpath@ietf.org>, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jsonpath/mh1e9WfxOEsPYaKiABS4gDE1HWo>
Subject: Re: [Jsonpath] JSONPath draft charter
X-BeenThere: jsonpath@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A summary description of the list to be included in the table on this page <jsonpath.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jsonpath>, <mailto:jsonpath-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jsonpath/>
List-Post: <mailto:jsonpath@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jsonpath-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonpath>, <mailto:jsonpath-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 15:49:00 -0000

Hello,

> I’d say: Saying that we do JSONPath already says that we are not doing JMESPath.

I agree, also I would say that the main point here is that JMESPath is
too complex to implement compared to JSONPath (and also computational
heavier) .

Talking about JSONPointer: users should keep using it when they are
looking for obtaining a subdocument (or just a value), JSONPointer
guarantees a result in constant time and memory in most
implementations (which might be good for security reasons) while this
is not possible with JSONPath or JMESPath. Also I think we should
encourage users about using JSONPointer when search capabilities are
not needed.

Therefore I think that each of them covers a well defined set of use
cases which is partially overlapping.

Regards,
Davide Bettio.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email