Re: [karp] Karp Agenda 2: KeyStore?
Gregory Lebovitz <gregory.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 22 March 2010 21:38 UTC
Return-Path: <gregory.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: karp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: karp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0EAF3A681B for <karp@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:38:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.446
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.446 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.022, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DeuqNzx8dylr for <karp@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:38:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iw0-f197.google.com (mail-iw0-f197.google.com [209.85.223.197]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8AD128C13A for <karp@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:38:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iwn35 with SMTP id 35so3046823iwn.31 for <karp@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Kas8/I9H50AnhEvgXjCuSva72RmwQvOHVlxv/QozISE=; b=UZuzYgGXgDzYrJAo0/QdUpQdaDXn3O2rj6fQni0b1Wdx/3oj+3YQUfXL/iEFL0tdF+ a0UnnWDLK8MxzFCdHw8KOocVFn9bOG5SzAweZD2iqXqdbwCn4ys6/fdCgtu6c4eTFI/A QgtesAejvvVEZ1v187wU9qAhc7U3xnM1Tef9s=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=epoyzIdlnTIym2fESV4zoG4zplv4sgVWCWqAXjBGTmGLAGSfd/cUsbjk+OwpXOkS2+ 0o0YxSL6o5lhmrknZCTW4p0m7JXM0ROWlRq3hboSxezg0J9QvDS/k1+blSM5qjNnk+/a R1rZUwf57waZyyxLzUS9zdJkZO22TDbzHiChY=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.151.212 with SMTP id d20mr1600901ibw.53.1269293919755; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <C7CD30AB.14B04%tim.polk@nist.gov>
References: <f1548841003221411u4fbc9c53u372fd5e66b2fed5d@mail.gmail.com> <C7CD30AB.14B04%tim.polk@nist.gov>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:38:39 -0700
Message-ID: <f1548841003221438k2b00be5dtcd7085cacb2098e1@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Lebovitz <gregory.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "Polk, William T." <william.polk@nist.gov>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0016e68ddac733de0804826a857e"
Cc: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, "karp@ietf.org" <karp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [karp] Karp Agenda 2: KeyStore?
X-BeenThere: karp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for key management for routing and transport protocols <karp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/karp>, <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/karp>
List-Post: <mailto:karp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/karp>, <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:38:26 -0000
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Polk, William T. <william.polk@nist.gov>wrote: > Gregory, > > There has really been no change to those documents since Hiroshima, so I > did not suggest a presentation. (We simply haven’t received any suggestion > to change them.) I do have karp on my schedule and will be in the room. > I'll leave it to the chairs to decide. Since the last preso was a BoF, it may make sense to do it again, if only to push people to read and review and provide input. > > I think that maintaining them as separate documents is advisable, given > their simplicity... > If there is applicability outside of karp-framework, then I agree. If the applicability is only w/in the karp-framework, then I'd suggest we suck it into the "KeyStore" section of that document. But I haven't thought too much about it until just now, sitting here with Bill Atwood, working on slides and open issues / open sections. Bill will have this as an open question on his slides and we can discuss in WG. WFY? Gregory > > Thanks, > > Tim > > > > On 3/22/10 2:11 PM, "Gregory M. Lebovitz" <gregory.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > > KARPies, Tim & Russ, > I notice that the current agenda for KARP does NOT include a presentation > by Tim/Russ on their documents that defines in more detail what > draft-ietf-karp-framework calls the KeyStore. I'm thinking that would be a > good thing to have presented again (it was presented at the BoF already > once), because we need to decide if these become WG documents, or how to > proceed them. > > Those documents are: > draft-housley-saag-crypto-key-table-01 > draft-polk-saag-rtg-auth-keytable-02 > > Another question is: "Do these documents serve better as stand-alone, or > ought they be incorporated into the karp-framework document" > > Thoughts? > > Gregory. > > -- ---- IETF related email from Gregory M. Lebovitz Juniper Networks
- [karp] Karp Agenda 2: KeyStore? Gregory Lebovitz
- Re: [karp] Karp Agenda 2: KeyStore? Gregory Lebovitz
- Re: [karp] Karp Agenda 2: KeyStore? Polk, William T.
- Re: [karp] Karp Agenda 2: KeyStore? Vishwas Manral
- Re: [karp] Karp Agenda 2: KeyStore? Sean Turner
- Re: [karp] Karp Agenda 2: KeyStore? Gregory Lebovitz
- Re: [karp] Karp Agenda 2: KeyStore? Polk, William T.
- Re: [karp] Karp Agenda 2: KeyStore? Polk, William T.
- Re: [karp] Karp Agenda 2: KeyStore? Polk, William T.
- Re: [karp] Karp Agenda 2: KeyStore? Vishwas Manral
- Re: [karp] Karp Agenda 2: KeyStore? Polk, William T.