IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [karp] Karp Agenda 2: KeyStore?

"Polk, William T." <william.polk@nist.gov> Mon, 22 March 2010 21:30 UTC

Return-Path: <william.polk@nist.gov>
X-Original-To: karp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: karp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A022A3A68B6 for <karp@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:30:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.843
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.843 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.375, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6tzudXmPQbJL for <karp@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:30:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.nist.gov (rimp2.nist.gov [129.6.16.227]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3652828C101 for <karp@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:30:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from WSXGHUB2.xchange.nist.gov (wsxghub2.nist.gov [129.6.18.19]) by smtp.nist.gov (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o2MLUqLI010372; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:30:52 -0400
Received: from MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov ([fe80::d479:3188:aec0:cb66]) by WSXGHUB2.xchange.nist.gov ([2002:8106:1213::8106:1213]) with mapi; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:30:35 -0400
From: "Polk, William T." <william.polk@nist.gov>
To: "Gregory M. Lebovitz" <gregory.ietf@gmail.com>, "karp@ietf.org" <karp@ietf.org>, "Polk, William T." <william.polk@nist.gov>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:35:23 -0400
Thread-Topic: Karp Agenda 2: KeyStore?
Thread-Index: AcrKBFPUSBI7HS+zR12rt/g15nAvdwAA0AqI
Message-ID: <C7CD30AB.14B04%tim.polk@nist.gov>
In-Reply-To: <f1548841003221411u4fbc9c53u372fd5e66b2fed5d@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C7CD30AB14B04timpolknistgov_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-NIST-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-NIST-MailScanner-From: william.polk@nist.gov
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:41:13 -0700
Subject: Re: [karp] Karp Agenda 2: KeyStore?
X-BeenThere: karp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for key management for routing and transport protocols <karp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/karp>, <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/karp>
List-Post: <mailto:karp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/karp>, <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:30:55 -0000

Gregory,

There has really been no change to those documents since Hiroshima, so I did not suggest a presentation.  (We simply haven't received any suggestion to change them.)  I do have karp on my schedule and will be in the room.

I think that maintaining them as separate documents is advisable, given their simplicity...

Thanks,

Tim


On 3/22/10 2:11 PM, "Gregory M. Lebovitz" <gregory.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

KARPies, Tim & Russ,
I notice that the current agenda for KARP does NOT include a presentation by Tim/Russ on their documents that defines in more detail what draft-ietf-karp-framework calls the KeyStore. I'm thinking that would be a good thing to have presented again (it was presented at the BoF already once), because we need to decide if these become WG documents, or how to proceed them.

Those documents are:
draft-housley-saag-crypto-key-table-01
draft-polk-saag-rtg-auth-keytable-02

Another question is:  "Do these documents serve better as stand-alone, or ought they be incorporated into the karp-framework document"

Thoughts?

Gregory.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email