Re: [keyassure] Bare keys again

Matt McCutchen <matt@mattmccutchen.net> Sat, 26 March 2011 01:01 UTC

Return-Path: <matt@mattmccutchen.net>
X-Original-To: keyassure@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: keyassure@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49BE028C102 for <keyassure@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:01:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gdlz8M17jauz for <keyassure@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:01:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a60.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcbbj.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.119]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9818E28C0CE for <keyassure@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:01:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a60.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a60.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C4353BC069; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:03:25 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=mattmccutchen.net; h=subject:from :to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= mattmccutchen.net; b=AQIL7zPFj069w/6YZTd3deQbhAuZNEiPx9A3QgIpBbD Kq0Y++t+K6RQ6bxiKESbE/ClrO7Qwac6E8zjuBrRpWCM+JRpY8VgTIWkwk7ns/3w jU6GuEcJWAM9669myayIAejopy1BjCsm5tVJdywusXjWXwh38mJ+AI9u9j9O7ynM =
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=mattmccutchen.net; h= subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; s= mattmccutchen.net; bh=eAaQuwoeM6c8agxEkb0bpIn/nWc=; b=YFgxKbSHCt WKaQvb4gbBef+YBD8F1QkELMIf0dAwxXkFP7W8IIxrLs7n+OQ5FykI9kBnpPqmsO UlyZayu1zbcwLRQPPinXWro37uTDuDr0io4FqiUgNHgkc4lNFA7kzfPazVWF/fYZ W15WARMLlkpuci10zvnhxhrqMwW/fJjvQ=
Received: from [192.168.1.40] (pool-96-231-2-98.washdc.east.verizon.net [96.231.2.98]) (Authenticated sender: matt@mattmccutchen.net) by homiemail-a60.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BFE7D3BC062; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:03:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: Matt McCutchen <matt@mattmccutchen.net>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@xelerance.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.10.1103251936160.1830@newtla.xelerance.com>
References: <92D68A5E-5CB7-4C80-8D7B-0B8D55D93608@kumari.net> <alpine.LFD.1.10.1103201932370.20162@newtla.xelerance.com> <9D285351-8D73-4C15-BE2C-5DF731C08DCE@vpnc.org> <alpine.LFD.1.10.1103202028110.20162@newtla.xelerance.com> <1300669586.2117.12.camel@localhost> <alpine.LFD.1.10.1103202211390.20162@newtla.xelerance.com> <1300739370.2117.40.camel@localhost> <alpine.LFD.1.10.1103211631260.20162@newtla.xelerance.com> <AANLkTimyOXv66UeG2q2dmt1-e_Ek6WPPH-coueFc7fDS@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTin1QjUbVFN8FqjL2SPRLSRRw4Ahs4zbhy4ZdZuX@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LFD.1.10.1103211727150.28224@newtla.xelerance.com> <alpine.LFD.1.10.1103230625150.18330@newtla.xelerance.com> <4D8AAC8E.8040107@mail-abuse.org> <alpine.LFD.1.10.1103250459370.21731@newtla.xelerance.com> <1301062867.11498.9.camel@localhost> <alpine.LFD.1.10.1103251936160.1830@newtla.xelerance.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 21:03:23 -0400
Message-ID: <1301101403.24429.15.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: keyassure@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [keyassure] Bare keys again
X-BeenThere: keyassure@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Key Assurance With DNSSEC <keyassure.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/keyassure>, <mailto:keyassure-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/keyassure>
List-Post: <mailto:keyassure@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:keyassure-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/keyassure>, <mailto:keyassure-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 01:01:51 -0000

On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 19:36 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2011, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 05:03 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> >> I was also pretty disappointed to see that when you send a
> >> trusted_ca_keys: pre_agreed value, that this is totally ignored on
> >> servers, including openssl.org.
> >
> > What else would you have expected?  That value is only meaningful in
> > contexts where the server knows what set of trust anchors you are
> > talking about.
> 
> I would have expected to only get the EE cert, and no CA certs whatsoever.

Why?  The https://www.openssl.org server is not part of a deployment in
which the pre_agreed value has a well-known meaning.  I think you're
still (willfully?) misreading RFC 6066.

-- 
Matt