IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: KITTEN: IETF 75 - 76

Love Hörnquist Åstrand <lha@kth.se> Tue, 01 September 2009 18:12 UTC

Return-Path: <lha@kth.se>
X-Original-To: kitten@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48FE93A7066 for <kitten@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 11:12:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Env2jsxe0PYq for <kitten@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 11:12:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822FF3A6B99 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 11:12:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay11.apple.com (relay11.apple.com [17.128.113.48]) by mail-out3.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A9517078EEC for <kitten@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 11:13:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 11807130-b7ca1ae00000654a-8a-4a9d6430b0ec
Received: from et.apple.com (et.apple.com [17.151.62.12]) by relay11.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 53.D1.25930.0346D9A4; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 11:13:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Received: from nutcracker.apple.com (nutcracker.apple.com [17.201.21.139]) by et.apple.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0KPB00LTS19SAO20@et.apple.com> for kitten@ietf.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 11:13:04 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: KITTEN: IETF 75 - 76
From: Love Hörnquist Åstrand <lha@kth.se>
In-reply-to: <20090901173110.GL1033@Sun.COM>
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 11:13:03 -0700
Message-id: <28C158D0-07C3-4C91-BDAB-378C48F05556@kth.se>
References: <4A87A69A.3050408@sun.com> <4A87E02D.7030503@isode.com> <200908180013.29152.leifj@mnt.se> <20090901131202.137bdd90.miallen@ioplex.com> <20090901173110.GL1033@Sun.COM>
To: Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1075.2)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAZE=
Cc: "kitten@ietf.org" <kitten@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 18:12:51 -0000

1 sep 2009 kl. 10:31 skrev Nicolas Williams:

> The problem with the callback variant is that it implies a threaded
> process model (which I don't mind, but which won't be feasible for  
> some
> implementors).

It does not require threads, the caller of the cb enabled ISC will  
have to call the event loop, that in turn will call the callback call.

It does require though that you select one event process system (or  
threads).

Love

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email