[L2sm] Removing EVC and OVC from L2SM

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Thu, 05 October 2017 14:41 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5404A1321BB for <l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 07:41:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0Ed024YZ3nO8 for <l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 07:41:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (asmtp3.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 731BB1321B6 for <l2sm@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 07:41:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v95EfZ7g029850 for <l2sm@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 15:41:35 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (218.122.115.87.dyn.plus.net [87.115.122.218]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v95EfWig029788 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <l2sm@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 15:41:34 +0100
Reply-To: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <l2sm@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 15:41:28 +0100
Message-ID: <015d01d33de8$08d12e70$1a738b50$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdM95rO5De3y6+9pQwaV6PUXVhwW+Q==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1679-8.1.0.1062-23374.000
X-TM-AS-Result: No--1.005-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--1.005-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: Z3L4srrNKAt8FFGtK5UwdYGLeiqu1yTKhHz3EzK//HzSYAzZ6KmqWohp c0cNJBVgKKN1cQangWAagCCNzTrLENvJAvCq+wLJ4nbwqqmOd2nTBg/CbgV2T7rfxlRjqBJ3X47 th4T5R3oQPSi1yFcBxiB7yVsihj14V9xWZ+A7xPLlM5hHF9yMby3S35ohUu37ClyrX4tOmxSjxY yRBa/qJX3mXSdV7KK4FAX4EtUi0PgLbigRnpKlKZx+7GyJjhAU71say0jyOFITbhDmBegQMgh1l Cp5WyPOD308+RXB3sUXWeuyVvSh99SxeFhBYHL7pVCFVXGtPoeZtpaI12m+3hlaof+C0tFV9HmA sM11v0u45mjKIIYY3xiCad9aBKWfm9p/RC99TJ5Lhb8xGEnVfg==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2sm/J-nAnC-GYYlOjpuAZbeCoNKej5M>
Subject: [L2sm] Removing EVC and OVC from L2SM
X-BeenThere: l2sm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The Layer Two Virtual Private Network Service Model \(L2SM\)" <l2sm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2sm>, <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/l2sm/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2sm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2sm>, <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 14:41:39 -0000

Hi,

During our interim we discussed the various attributes that support EVC and OVC.
They were motivated by attempts to support MEF-defined services.

The meeting made some observations:
- The primary focus of our work should be to describe IETF work
- We should limit this module to describing IETF L2VPN services
- We should observe (if it is our opinion) that that mapping from
   this module to the MEF's EVC service attributes may be possible
  (but we should state that doing that is out of scope for this document)

Considering that, the meeting had no objection to removing the evc and ovc
subtrees from the module. Additionally, while we would retain 'metro-networks'
as useful for multi-domain, we would drop ovc-id from that part of the module.

This email is your chance to object or point out why we were wrong.

Silence will mean that the next revision removes evc and ovc.

Thanks,

Adrian